But who opened them up to this line of coverage? Some speechwriting staffer did.
Agreed. No responsible speech writer/aide is going to plagiarize a speech like that. Logically, it was intentional.
And the MSM don’t have to bite for it. Sure, cover it, but I see it’s at the top of Google News, and I imagine it’s the talk of all the t.v. news shows this morning.
As if they aren’t many more important things (and as if the actions of one speechwriter are that significant).
They’ve already spent more time on this nothing story from 12 hours ago - and no doubt have gotten all excited about “ethics” - than they spent covering the FBI investigation of Hillary Clinton in the month prior to her non-indictment (which was almost nothing on network news).