Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CalPERS posts worst year since 2009, with slim returns
LA Times ^ | July 18, 2016 | James Koren

Posted on 07/18/2016 8:56:52 PM PDT by bkopto

California’s largest public pension fund made a return of less than 1% in its most recent fiscal year, the fund’s worst performance since 2009.

The California Public Employees’ Retirement System said Monday that its rate of return for the year ended June 30 was just 0.61%. What’s more, Ted Eliopoulos, the pension fund’s chief investment officer, said the poor year has pushed CalPERS’ long-term returns below expected levels.

“We have some challenges to confront,” Eliopoulos said during a conference call. “We’re moving into a much more challenging, low-return environment.”

CalPERS assumes that, in the long-term, it will earn investment returns averaging 7.5% a year. If the fund fails to meet that goal, the state’s taxpayers could be forced to make up any shortfall in pension funding.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS: california; calpers; pension; pensionfund; publicemployees; retirement; returns
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
And the hits just keep on coming. Good luck CA government and taxpayers.
1 posted on 07/18/2016 8:56:52 PM PDT by bkopto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bkopto

They divested from Israel and gun companies didn’t they?

I guess the windmill factories aren’t paying too well these days.


2 posted on 07/18/2016 8:58:42 PM PDT by headstamp 2 (Fear is the mind killer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bkopto

Don’t worry - taxpayers will make up any shortfalls of the insane public union pensions...


3 posted on 07/18/2016 8:58:57 PM PDT by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bkopto

CalPERS assumes that, in the long-term, it will earn investment returns averaging 7.5% a year.

###############################################

Way too high for this Obama economy.


4 posted on 07/18/2016 9:08:39 PM PDT by Graybeard58 (There's a race war raging, I didn't start it but I have chosen sides.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bkopto

If I understand correctly, much of the CalPERs board is made up of union creeps; and if so, might a full, complete, and public audit of their investment choices and rationale be in order?


5 posted on 07/18/2016 9:08:56 PM PDT by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never...except for convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2banana

How Democrats operate: private profits, public losses, minus a hefty transaction fee in all cases. Heads they win, tails you lose.


6 posted on 07/18/2016 9:12:56 PM PDT by Reeses (A journey of a thousand miles begins with a government pat down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bkopto

They should just do indexing and fire the crony advisors making hundreds of millions or more per year.


7 posted on 07/18/2016 9:18:55 PM PDT by aynrandfreak (Being a Democrat means never having to say you're sorry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bkopto

This is what happens when the Federal government wants to keep interest rates so low so that they can keep borrowing more money. It also what happens when bankers want to use other peoples money to get rich without paying anything for the privilege.


8 posted on 07/18/2016 9:21:47 PM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bkopto
Cal-PERS lost 9 million dollars in a now failed Greek hedge fund managed by none other than Hillary Clinton's son-in-law. Put another way, the Clinton extended family picked up 9 million dollars from Cal-Pers.
9 posted on 07/18/2016 9:24:12 PM PDT by Dads Bag (red county in a blue state)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bkopto

If The Fed says 0% interest - zero it is. Deal with it.


10 posted on 07/18/2016 9:27:06 PM PDT by I am Richard Brandon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bkopto
The Federal Reserve is the culprit here. Pension funds invest in a lot of fixed income securities. In fact they are often limited in what they can invest in. Currently the fed rate is so low that no one can make money on fixed income. As long as the Fed holds down rates, pension funds will continue to go bust.

This is the exact issue of why institutional investors in 2007-2008 bought risky investments like subprime mortgages, packaged up into bonds that were declared to be AAA, even though everyone knew they were tremendous risks. Interest rates had been falling since 1981, and they had to keep chasing higher returns. This meant adding risk.

11 posted on 07/18/2016 9:29:42 PM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

CALPERS is waiting to go all in on the High Speed train to nowhere. Those returns should take it right over the top,


12 posted on 07/18/2016 9:31:48 PM PDT by Kozy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: bkopto

I’ll be right there when the state has to start selling things like art, parks, state senate office furniture...


13 posted on 07/18/2016 9:33:16 PM PDT by VanShuyten ("a shadow...draped nobly in the folds of a gorgeous eloquence.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kozy

Probably trying to hook themselves onto the US taxpayer for a bailout when it all goes bust.


14 posted on 07/18/2016 9:33:19 PM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

“The Federal Reserve is the culprit here. Pension funds invest in a lot of fixed income securities. In fact they are often limited in what they can invest in. “

You should look up the CalPers asset allocation and then revise your post ...


15 posted on 07/18/2016 9:43:04 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

“This is the exact issue of why institutional investors in 2007-2008 bought risky investments like subprime mortgages, packaged up into bonds that were declared to be AAA, “

Those with subprime mortgages were given BBB ...


16 posted on 07/18/2016 9:45:51 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

Way too high for almost any economy. 30-year treasuries have not yielded 7% in over 20 years. Big funds like these also face 2 reasonable restrictions: They have to remain diversified, and they have to limit risk. That means they will face diminishing returns the larger they get, and could not truly outperform over time. They would need to either lock in high returns by buying T-Bills when they are above 7.5%, or the economy would have to be growing at a similar clip including of course stocks. But its not a reasonable expectation to plan on 7.5% “average” over long periods of time because we have a Federal Reserve that seeks as part of its primary mission to keep inflation in check by manipulating interest rates. If rates are above 7.5% that means the economy is really humming along at an inflation rate over 5%, but jacking rates itself is a measure taken to slow the economy, to slow inflation. So Calpers expectations essentially runs counter to monetary policy.


17 posted on 07/18/2016 9:48:01 PM PDT by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

CALPERS is waiting to go all in on the High Speed train to nowhere. Those returns should take it right over the top,


18 posted on 07/18/2016 9:53:45 PM PDT by Kozy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: bkopto

They need to get on the Trump bandwagon quick.


19 posted on 07/18/2016 10:42:10 PM PDT by umgud (ban muslims, not guns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bkopto

The shortfall of 7% will compound every year unless the fund makes over a 7.5% return next year.

This is what the “financial advisors” aka scam artists never tell you when you have a bad year.

The shortfall should be collected from California taxpayers now—but don’t sit and wait for that to happen.


20 posted on 07/18/2016 11:10:26 PM PDT by cgbg (Epistemology is not a spectator sport.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson