Why did you not even bother to read the article? You are dead wrong:
>>But under Canadian law, he also became a citizen of that country the moment he was born.
Unless the Texas Republican senator formally renounces that citizenship, he will remain a citizen of both countries, legal experts say.
Snip
Hes a Canadian, said Toronto lawyer Stephen Green, past chairman of the Canadian Bar Associations Citizenship and Immigration Section.
Snip
If a child was born in the territory, he is Canadian, period, said France Houle, a law professor at the University of Montreal. He can ask for a passport. He can vote.
The fact that Cruz left Canada when he was 4 doesnt affect his status there, either.
If you leave when youre 2 minutes old, youre still an American. Its the same in Canada, said Allison Christians, a law professor at McGill University in Montreal. Hes a Canadian citizen.
Snip
The situation reflects the overlapping jurisdictions, said Demetrios Papademetriou, president of the Washington-based Migration Policy Institute, who called birthright citizenship common in English-speaking countries.
If Ted Cruz was born in Canada, he is Canadian. He is American. He is a dual citizen, he said.<<
[These are only a sampling of the quotes. There are many more. You really should have read the article.]
Because the article isn’t WRONG... it’s just missing a key piece of information.
Neither of us disagrees that in 2009, Cruz was a Canadian citizen.
The weird fact is that he was not recognized as a Canadian citizen between 1977 and 2008.