Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rktman

De facto they can disarm everyone going group by group. Older people, young people, former military people, those who have had a DUI, those who have had any physical issue such as poor eyesight, dizziness, those who take medications for anxiety or sleep disorders, those who are around small children, those on the no-fly list...the subgroups of ineligible is infinite and everybody could be found to fit in some subgroup.

If one is deprived of the ability to balance their lack of size and strength to defend themselves against the stronger and younger people then there should be private security provided around the clock at no expense, just as is done for public officials. Old people are already targeted by ne’er do wells who know they are fragile physically.


6 posted on 07/18/2016 7:04:38 AM PDT by Anima Mundi (Envy is just passive, lazy greed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Anima Mundi

And all of those today who claim that it “reasonable” to use an anonymous, non-verified “no fly list” of “terrorists” as a criteria for seizing firearms ....

But you CANNOT arrest (or even investigate!) a Muslim for terrorism. Until he shoots a room full of homosexuals.


17 posted on 07/18/2016 7:31:35 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson