Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: drewh

While I would like to think of this as true, I can’t believe that Clinton (either one) would ever agree to a lie detector test (secret or otherwise).


11 posted on 07/17/2016 2:46:47 PM PDT by BruceS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: BruceS

With Hillary, a Lie Detector test is quite simple.

1. Are her lips moving?

(if “yes”, subject is pathological)


20 posted on 07/17/2016 2:48:49 PM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: BruceS

Normally I would agree she would never take a Polygraph. What is usually done in these high profile cases is the subject takes a polygraph with their own private tester. This happened in OJ. Since she couldn’t pass they may have given her one with the FBI and if all else failed claimed she passed. Someone spilled the “dirt” and this is what we have. No way the Enquirer would claim this if she never took a test. She would own the entire company from a lawsuit. Lets see if there is any reaction from this Lying Bitch.


36 posted on 07/17/2016 3:02:58 PM PDT by DrDude (Does anyone have a set of balls anymore?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: BruceS

Having that level of security clearance requires - at least of us peons - a background investigation, a full-scope polygraph, and periodic reinvestigations with polygraph. If you refuse to take a polygraph or in any way refuse to cooperate with an investigation, you lose your clearance. At least if you’re a regular peon.


74 posted on 07/17/2016 4:51:42 PM PDT by PLMerite (Compromise is Surrender: The Revolution...will not be kind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson