Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Osage Orange
This is the operative part of Perry's statement.

"Well, it’s not," Perry agreed, adding it might not only in the literal sense. "It’s a wall, but it’s a technological wall, it’s a digital wall. There are some that hear this is going to be 1,200 miles from Brownsville to El Paso, 30-foot high, and listen, I know you can’t do that."

A physical wall works just fine from El Paso overland to the Pacific. But you ust don't build a physical wall along a river -- especially if it's the only water source in a semi-arid region. Ranchers and livestock and wildlife on both sides of the river need unhindered access to the water.

That's not to say that a secure barrier can't nonetheless be erected. The Israelis have a similar problem when the Jordan River is the only thing separating them from Jordan. There is no fence along this border, save for a common 6' fence of hogwire, mounted on metal posts and topped by two strands of barbed wire that runs about a quarter-mile back from the river. There are frequent gates, most of them left open.

The real "wall" in this case are Israeli border guards supported by high-tech devices -- sensors, cameras, etc. -- and are highly mobile, with ready access to previously developed strong points and firing positions. If it works for Israel on the Jordan, it can work for us on the Rio Grande.

Thus, the Rio Grande border can be effectively secured without a wall...if Trump wants to do it.

40 posted on 07/11/2016 5:59:48 PM PDT by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: okie01

Yep........


43 posted on 07/11/2016 6:05:46 PM PDT by Osage Orange (FUBAR / SNAFU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: okie01

The truth. Surprised you haven’t been flamed for posting it.


56 posted on 07/11/2016 7:25:06 PM PDT by Jedidah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: okie01

” A physical wall works just fine from El Paso overland to the Pacific. But you ust don’t build a physical wall along a river — especially if it’s the only water source in a semi-arid region. Ranchers and livestock and wildlife on both sides of the river need unhindered access to the water.

That’s not to say that a secure barrier can’t nonetheless be erected. The Israelis have a similar problem when the Jordan River is the only thing separating them from Jordan. There is no fence along this border, save for a common 6’ fence of hogwire, mounted on metal posts and topped by two strands of barbed wire that runs about a quarter-mile back from the river. There are frequent gates, most of them left open.

The real “wall” in this case are Israeli border guards supported by high-tech devices — sensors, cameras, etc. — and are highly mobile, with ready access to previously developed strong points and firing positions. If it works for Israel on the Jordan, it can work for us on the Rio Grande.

Thus, the Rio Grande border can be effectively secured without a wall...if Trump wants to do it.”

All you Trumpers don’t look now, but the hated Ted Cruz spelled out very similar technologies and modalities out during the campaign, when explaining his border policy.


61 posted on 07/11/2016 8:36:57 PM PDT by mtrott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson