Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Here's the weapon used by the Dallas shooter
Gunboards.com ^ | 10 July 2016 | Mene Mene Tekel Upharsin

Posted on 07/10/2016 11:58:18 AM PDT by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

Here's a pic of the weapon used by the shooter in Dallas.

Post-explosion photo of Saiga A-74 7.62x39mm?



TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: dallas; micah; shooter; weapon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-104 next last
To: 1FreeAmerican

“Looks like someone just laid it on the floor.”

Probably because they did to get a clear photo of it, more or less “in situ” for evidence.


81 posted on 07/10/2016 3:39:24 PM PDT by PLMerite (Compromise is Surrender: The Revolution...will not be kind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Jan_Sobieski
"Yes, fired both. Texas cops are well trained. I just find it hard to believe that the presumably untrained PFC was alone..."

I'm older and am not interested in matters of young men's work except as a bystander and concerned citizen, but here's a little advice from past training experiences both military and civilian. Emphasize mobility and cover more.

Police training is good for emphasis where a police officer is facing someone who might be dangerous (car stop, in a room or otherwise, remember "close, dark, fast"). Do close range night fire on a range at night--very important.

But where a member of a police agency is walking down a street or otherwise publicly visible without facing anyone in particular and comes under fire, he should move to good cover first. Do so very quickly. Use a masonry structure (column, masonry plant box, whatever), corner of a building, wheels of a vehicle, a light post, a low spot on the ground or slight mound if necessary. The movement can greatly lessen the odds of being hit, and cover is better. Train to do so, and with enough repetitions to make the move to cover second nature.

More training is the answer to increasing survivability odds. As for danger, it's always there. Anything can happen. No one is indestructible. It's not news to someone with good training, but it's a good reminder for all. More restrictive laws might have an effect opposite of what we're trying to achieve.

The only way to decrease the frequency of murders in general would be to go back to emphasizing traditional morality more, but our lawmakers and their most influential constituents have been taking us in the other direction for decades (laws and policies conducive to more divorce, cohabitation, fatherlessness, bad employment policies, bad international trade policies, regulations against good private land uses, regulations against other productive activities and much more).


82 posted on 07/10/2016 3:42:22 PM PDT by familyop ("Welcome to Costco. I love you." --Costco greeter in the movie, "Idiocracy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Jan_Sobieski

Another thing... ;-)

When escorting a protest or otherwise walking with other police, spread out a little. Don’t walk or stand so close to each other as to present a collective target.

All the best.


83 posted on 07/10/2016 3:46:17 PM PDT by familyop ("Welcome to Costco. I love you." --Costco greeter in the movie, "Idiocracy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: plain talk
Looks like Micah blowed up real good.

Hope the robot is ok.

84 posted on 07/10/2016 3:46:33 PM PDT by The_Media_never_lie ("And, if you're not queen, my dear, think you that you're wronged?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
Just curious - What makes anyone think these are legit photos from Dallas and not some internet f@&*ery?
85 posted on 07/10/2016 3:46:42 PM PDT by nralife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyop

Good advice!


86 posted on 07/10/2016 3:50:18 PM PDT by Jan_Sobieski (Sanctification)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Bender2

Early on they were reporting multiple shooters so one could have had an SKS.


87 posted on 07/10/2016 3:56:08 PM PDT by ViLaLuz (2 Chronicles 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sockmonkey

>>>Graphic Pic Warning!!!<<<

This is FR. That picture is as graphic as a picture of a Kitten, Puppy or someone Posting a picture of Dessert.

I just hope that is really a picture of the SOB.


88 posted on 07/10/2016 3:58:25 PM PDT by Kickass Conservative (There is nothing Democratic about the Democrat Party. (Or the GOPe))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

A Bulgy!


89 posted on 07/10/2016 4:02:21 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Democrats bait then switch; their fishy voters buy it every time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: The_Republic_Of_Maine

Yes I have seen no proof that is the weapon used by the perp. That pic could be from anywhere. It does not appear to have sustained any type of damage that you would expect in a bomb explosion. Like I said the sight is pristine. I have a Bulgarian AK 74 and this looks more like an AK 47 to me. Early reports said the weapon was an SKS. So who knows? or as somebody else mentioned maybe more than one shooter.


90 posted on 07/10/2016 4:27:58 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: nralife

Daily Mail of London published them this afternoon as well. We’ll find out soon enough.


91 posted on 07/10/2016 4:28:55 PM PDT by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin (Freedom is the freedom to discipline yourself so others don't have to do it for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

Thanks.


92 posted on 07/10/2016 4:52:21 PM PDT by nralife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Trod Upon

Could easily have been the 7N6 rounds used as well, recently banned as being classified as armor piercing (AP).


93 posted on 07/10/2016 5:37:20 PM PDT by SgtHooper (If you remember the 60's, YOU WEREN'T THERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2

Nothing Israeli going on there. That’s pure Ruskie/Bulgy.


94 posted on 07/10/2016 6:02:22 PM PDT by The Toll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Steel Dragon

Bingo!

Like my tagline sez, I’ve lost my patience!

Stay safe, FRiend!


95 posted on 07/10/2016 6:06:29 PM PDT by sauropod (Beware the fury of a patient man. I've lost my patience!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2

The ballistics investigation will reveal if more than one rifle caliber was used. 47 rounds tend to go straight through whereas 74 rounds kind of buzz around inside.


96 posted on 07/10/2016 6:19:15 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Democrats bait then switch; their fishy voters buy it every time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: SgtHooper

Yeah, but they’re really just inexpensive military mild steel core, cheaper than lead core. The AP thing was just a pretext for banning an inexpensive ammo source. Real AP ammo is going to be depleted uranium or have a hardened tungsten carbide penetrator. Forgive my pedantry if you know this already, it’s just the “steel core = AP” thing is a pet peeve, so I never miss the opportunity to blather about it in case anyone not in the know reads this. :)


97 posted on 07/11/2016 12:21:54 AM PDT by Trod Upon (Government employees and welfare recipients are both net tax consumers. Often for life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Eagles6

SKS is 7.62x39, like AK47. AK74 is 5.45x39.


98 posted on 07/11/2016 12:24:37 AM PDT by Trod Upon (Government employees and welfare recipients are both net tax consumers. Often for life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Trod Upon

That’s what my post said.


99 posted on 07/11/2016 2:35:05 AM PDT by Eagles6 ( Valley Forge Redux. If not now, when? If not here, where? If not us then who?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Trod Upon

You are correct on all points, and thanks for posting this information.


100 posted on 07/11/2016 8:21:06 AM PDT by SgtHooper (If you remember the 60's, YOU WEREN'T THERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-104 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson