Posted on 07/08/2016 3:45:13 PM PDT by MaxistheBest
Most voters disagree with FBI Director James Comey’s decision not to seek a criminal indictment of Hillary Clinton.
The FBI concluded that Clinton potentially exposed top secret information to hostile countries when she used a private e-mail server as secretary of State, but Comey announced yesterday that the FBI has decided not to pursue a criminal indictment in this matter. A Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey – taken last night - finds that 37% of Likely U.S. Voters agree with the FBI’s decision. But 54% disagree and believe the FBI should have sought a criminal indictment of Clinton. Ten percent (10%) are undecided. (To see survey question wording, click here.)
Sixty-four percent (64%) of Democrats agree with Comey’s decision not to seek an indictment of their party’s presumptive presidential nominee. Seventy-nine percent (79%) of Republicans, 63% of voters not affiliated with either major political party and 25% of Democrats disagree with the decision.
(Excerpt) Read more at rasmussenreports.com ...
I’m pretty sure if this poll were taken before Comey’s statements the results would have been different. I think a lot of voters that were willing to give her a pass based on the perceived (or reality) partisanship of the GOP led investigation, have now heard the truth from someone(Comey) with the highest trust factor.
His 15 minute tale of gross negligence, gross mishandling, etc. has definitely left a mark. Trump should be able to take advantage of this, if he pushes it. This would be a great time to run some ads in Florida reminding people why she can’t be trusted. He can’t leave it up to the media to do it’s job.
This should be one of Trump’s primary themes from here on out, along with her constant stream of lies, and corruption. Keep repeating that 54 percent think that Lying Crooked Hillary should have been prosecuted, and only 37 percent say she shouldn’t.
Hammering home those stats day in and day out over the next 4 months, it would probably have an effect.
I’d like some (constructive) feedback.
FBI stands for Federal Bureau of INVESTIGATION
I thought that they were an investigative agency. For example: a traffic cop pulls you over for running a red light, notices several (Hundreds) of packages of material in the back seat. Calls for a dog team and supervisor.
His (and his supervisor’s) job is to collect evidence of a crime, inform the “perp” of accusations and rights. Place him (or her) under arrest, and prefer charges (with evidence) to the appropriate prosecutorial authority.
Why is Comey determining whether to prosecute (or refer to a grand jury) or not? Isn’t it his job to collect evidence?
I cannot wait to render my verdict on her: GUILTY!!!
Had Comey performed oral sex on Slick Willie in Times Square at rush hour and claimed that he was giving Slick Willie “penis CPR” he would have more chance of being believed than the utter nonsense he presented at his press conference and Congressional testimony.
Was a grand jury empaneled to charge Pagliano?
What charges were leveled against Pagliano that put so much pressure on him to spill his information?
How was Pagliano offered immunity? Who offered immunity?
Why wasn't Pagliano charged?
LOL!
There's that phantom invention of the mentally handicapped with special empowerment, the evil apparition, "Most..."
And the feebleminded fall into line.
I suppose if there is no meaningful qualification to vote, it is as good as an army...
Well, HilLIARy, you WILL reap-—just what you have sown.
Comey used to be a federal prosecutor under Guiliani in New York.
Guiliani said this is what his office would have called a “slam dunk” case.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.