Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Enchante

Rep. Lummis (WY) asking about statute US 1924!!!!!! yay

why is Hillary Clinton, an attorney .... how could not know the law

Comey: has to prove person “knew” what they were doing was unlawful.... Comey has worked to “stop the criminalization of negligence”

Lummis — but the “intent” in this statute is to retain the docs at an unauthorized location

Comey: “should have known, must have known....” does not get you there

Lummis: gets Comey to admit that Hillary’s ATTORNEYS did not have requisite security clearances to handle those docs


401 posted on 07/07/2016 8:14:32 AM PDT by Enchante (Hillary's new campaign slogan: "Guilty as hell, free as a bird!! Laws are for peasants!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 377 | View Replies ]


To: Enchante

Isn’t giving her attorneys access to those documents “intent” to expose classified information?


408 posted on 07/07/2016 8:15:50 AM PDT by Kenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 401 | View Replies ]

To: Enchante
-- Comey: has to prove person "knew" what they were doing was unlawful ... --

Baloney. They have to know the information was classified, and know it was being removed from a secure location, that's all.

Comey is rewriting all the statutes, just for Hillary mind you. Everybody else gets "the other" definition.

467 posted on 07/07/2016 8:29:52 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 401 | View Replies ]

To: Enchante

Comey has worked to “stop the criminalization of negligence”

So, he indeed *DID* rewrite the law.


775 posted on 07/07/2016 10:04:26 AM PDT by Chaguito
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 401 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson