Posted on 07/06/2016 9:42:33 AM PDT by detective
After laying out a long list of her many lies and prosecutable crimes gross negligence with regard to national security being the most profound FBI director Comey said "no reasonable prosecutor would bring charges" against Hillary Clinton. He said she did not have any "intent" to put the nation at risk.
No intent! Four private servers for her government business does not qualify as intent to deceive? She did what she did to keep her illegal wheeling and dealing out of the hands of any law enforcement agency, and she succeeded. She most certainly did put the nation at risk. It will take years to discover to what degree national security has been endangered. As Bill Ayers put it, "[g]uilty as sin, free as a bird...what a country."
No one should be shocked by this turn of events. Just as John Roberts upended the Constitution to proclaim Obamacare legal, just as Eric Holder refused to prosecute the Black Panthers for voter intimidation or turn over Fast and Furious documents, just as Comey declined to prosecute Lois Lerner for her many, many crimes, the men and women of position in D.C. long ago sold their souls for the power to preserve each other's power, no matter what crimes they commit in furtherance of their personal agendas and greed. This is how they roll, all of them. People who challenge this status quo, like Ted Cruz, are relentlessly maligned by an unprincipled media who in mind-numbed fashion effectively destroy any persons of character who wander onto their playground. (It was Ted Cruz who said, "Hillary embodies the corruption of Washington." She does indeed.)
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
I’m surprise a terrorist sniper hasn’t surfaced.
Comey said they could find no "Intent" to commit crimes-
Does he believe they DID NOT KNOW it was illegal to be careless and negligent with classified material?
The FBI has gone gangster.
The former prez of the UN general assembly died from a “work out” accident at his home last week, was set to testify about Clinton corruption.
And heard this AM Guccifer the Hillary email hacker was found dead in his cell in Virginia this morning.
Nothing to see here, move along.
I wonder if someone is keeping that Clinton death list updated still...
Which is exactly why she may get that job.
Exactly. Of course there was intent. They were aware of the laws and regulations regarding classified. No on, NO ONE gets access without briefings and periodic retraining. So they knew the regs, and they knowingly and willingly violated them. The whole “no intent” thing, in addition to being a lie, is irrelevant. Intent or not, laws were broken! Are the laws going to be enforced here or not? Can I go drive a new car off the lot without paying for it - as long as I claim there was no intent to steal it, that I was just going to park it in my garage for them in case it hailed or something? Is that now a viable legal defense that is consequence free?
Guccifer dead? Link? Where did you hear or read that?
Comey did what he was told. And that was to keep this at “arms length” from the Obama administration by not submitting it to Lynch (A cabinet position).
He should have dumped it in her lap.
When a government no longer needs the people, it is tyranny.
“Intent” was established by conducting government business on her private servers in an attempt to escape FOIA laws.
It’s just the Chicago Way.
Conspiracy is a separate offense, by which someone conspires or agrees with someone else to do something which, if actually carried out, would amount to another federal crime or offense. It is an agreement or a kind of partnership for criminal purposes in which each member becomes the agent or partner of every other member. It is not necessary to prove that the criminal plan actually was accomplished or that the conspirator was involved in all stages of the planning or knew all of the details involved. The main elements that need to be proven are a voluntary agreement to participate and some overt act by one of the conspirators in furtherance of the criminal plan. If a person has an understanding of the unlawful nature of a plan and knowingly and willfully joins in that plan on one occasion, that is sufficient to convict him for conspiracy even though he had not participated before and even though he played only a minor part. A conspiracy may exist when the parties use legal means to accomplish an illegal result, or to use illegal means to achieve something that in itself is lawful.
Wheel and chain conspiracies are two types of conspiracies described in prosecuting offenders. A chain conspiracy involves parties linked together in a linear fashion. Typical drug or firearm smuggling organizations are chain conspiracies. It may consist of a series of drug deals, from manufacturer to the street dealer. In a wheel conspiracy, the ringleader is the “hub” and subsidiary parties are the “spokes”. It is generally easier for prosecution to prove that a “chain” constituted a single conspiracy than it is to prove that a “wheel” was a single organization
So did Nazi camp guards, that doesn't make it legal or right.
Christian Times newspaper.
Search Guccifer in Google
I wish more people understood this. The whole R versus D show is pure THEATER. It's an act. They are the same side of the same dirty coin.
Never said it was.
Our government is officially a crime syndicate.
That’s why Washington is now defined as the “District of Corruption” The venality in that district is over whelming.
sorta like pro wrestlng?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.