Roberts will “fix” the lower court ruling.
My wife and I have not had health care insurance since January of 2014. We’re 62. We trust completely in the Lord. We’ve also saved approximately $32,000 after tax dollars in that time.
Well, not counting the $675 in health care including prescription glasses and sunglasses and dental visits, which would not have been covered anyway.
It’s amazing the deals you can swing when you pay cash. :-)
Herr obama vill not be pleazt.
I’d love to be able to buy my old insurance, which was cancelled because it didn’t cover everything Obamacare does... things I don’t need. I used to pay $178 with major medical covered. First Obamacare pricetag was 516, then in January it went up to 726, I had to switch to an HMO... which doesn’t even allow you to fill prescriptions at normal pharmacies, and I still get to pay $450 for this luxury...
Judges Janice Rogers Brown,
Wow, I wish they made this Ruling back in December 2013 when our Health Insurance Policy didn’t qualify under Obamacare and we had a Defcon 4 situation replacing it.
Janice Rogers Brown should be on the Supreme Court.
“Disagreeing with Congress’s expressly codified policy choices isn’t a luxury administrative agencies enjoy,” the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said on Friday in a decision that criticized “administrative overreach” by the Department of Health and Human Services.
...
How dare they not recognize the unlimited power of the emperor.
It will be interesting to see how this impacts HHS plan to limit catastrophic health coverage to a one time 90 day period. I don’t have all the particulars, but this made the news a few weeks ago..
PING!!!
From article:
A federal appeals court has ruled that consumers must be allowed to buy certain types of health insurance that do not meet the stringent standards of the Affordable Care Act, deciding that the administration had gone beyond the terms of federal law.
The court struck down a rule issued by the Obama administration that barred the sale of such insurance as a separate stand-alone product.
“Disagreeing with Congress’s expressly codified policy choices isn’t a luxury administrative agencies enjoy,” the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said on Friday in a decision that criticized “administrative overreach” by the Department of Health and Human Services.
Good.