To: richardb72
The one time I disagree with Lott.
L
3 posted on
07/05/2016 1:33:53 PM PDT by
Lurker
(Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
To: Lurker
I agree and Comey shoe horned her into this travesty of a perspective. He caved in!
10 posted on
07/05/2016 1:36:02 PM PDT by
DarthVader
(Politicians govern out of self interest, Statesmen govern for a Vision greater than themselves)
To: Lurker
Petraeus?
It didn’t help him
14 posted on
07/05/2016 1:39:00 PM PDT by
ladyjane
To: Lurker
The one time I disagree with Lott. Agreed. Lott tried to stay non-partisan and consequently failed to sell his argument.
This isn't his usual area of commentary, either.
To: Lurker
Yep.
Maybe he’s been hanging around shilling pundits for too long.
107 posted on
07/05/2016 6:03:01 PM PDT by
YogicCowboy
("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - JRRT)
To: Lurker
Actually I think Lott...was very objectively telling what actually happened.
We can't have politicians in charge..being prosecuted by people that are hired and paid by the same politicians.
The system is rigged now...and Lott pretty much says that. And I agree...totally.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson