Posted on 07/05/2016 10:14:51 AM PDT by GilGil
“To be clear this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions but that’s not what we’re deciding here. “
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
BTTT
Smoke rises from law libraries across the land...
Betting Comey resigns before the month is out. Any takers?
HEY Famous But Incompetent, since the laws don’t apply to the bitch then they don’t apply to me, I’m keeping my magazines that hold over thirty rounds cause it looks like i will need them soon!
Now the next question comes out. If a person engages in behavior that indicates a question as to their trust in handling sensitive information, those people are normally stripped of their security clearance and disallowed access to sensitive information. How can a president handle his/her job without being able to view and write sensitive information all the way up to top secret needs?
And what other sanctions are there related to the punishment for the openly instructing subordinates how to by pass a government computer security system?
Treason is her middle name.
red
I'm pretty sure that Clinton's clearance was administratively terminated when she resigned as SoS. Under the regulations, she would have no further need for a clearance, and that's SOP.
But, I haven't seen a signed SF-312 that makes it official.
When laws are selectively enforced, anarchy is not far away.
Good luck with that.. have you seen the polls lately? Things won’t change until CW2 which will probably come after our crash as a superpower on the global stage.
It’s a can we’re kicking down the road to our children and in some cases grandchildren. Once the TVs and cell phones stop working people will find themselves starving. Only then will the comfortable masses finally rise up and decide they would like to live in a free and fair country again.
At this point, what difference does it make?
This begs the question since Clinton and Obama are serial liars, how can anyone believe what they are saying?
It was not!
“To be clear this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions but that’s not what we’re deciding here.“That last part should mean what they are deciding is to prosecute her to the fullest extent of the law for her many counts of cries concerning her emails.
But no because the Director wants to live. Ron Brown was going to spill the goods. Vince Foster was going to spill the goods. Others that did expose the Clinton Crime Machine Dixie Mafia are dead too.
Good find, those email CWB:
Meanwhile Roberts is rejoicing his butt will no longer hurt when he sits on the Bench.
That’s true. A grubby “person” would face sanctions. But not a Clinton.
And now it could not be more open and In Your Face. They are openly declaring that the US is a tyranny and the “rulers” can do whatever the **** they want, break any laws they want, and they get no punishment at all, and yet if regular citizens are innocent but deemed “enemies” of the government, they get reamed and the very gov is used as a tool to go after them.
100%
Patience. When the Donald is inaugurated, the Clintons will be toast.
Did anybody seriously expect Obama’s underlings to take down Hillary on the eve of an election? Anybody? I know there were countless posts about how she was going to be thrown under the bus but seriously guys, this was obvious from the very beginning.
But, look at the bright side.
Comey’s children will stay alive!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.