Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CWW
“NO REASONABLE PROSECUTOR WOULD TAKE SUCH A CASE.”

We cannot hope for a few honest stand up government employees, leaks or even Trump to make things right. It is up to us expose the corruption and drive a stake through the heart of DC.

Comey says no reasonable prosecutor would take on such a case? Right. No reasonable prosecutor has ever prosecuted [and won] such a case Ever?

OK Comey, game on. It is time to prove you wrong. Time to find such cases prosecuted by reasonable prosecutors.

My hunch is there are enough case to determine what you meant was we will know what you meant was ' no reasonable prosecutor [wanting to maintain their livelihood] would take on such a case [involving the Clintons].'

.

Just don't know where to start looking.

647 posted on 07/05/2016 10:53:33 AM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Protect the Bill of Rights
“NO REASONABLE PROSECUTOR WOULD TAKE SUCH A CASE.”

That was Comey's way of preemptively discrediting any DoJ prosecutors or FBI agents who come out publicly to criticize this decision. In essence it's the same sort of demagoguery that 0bama and Hillary employ on a regular basis.

656 posted on 07/05/2016 11:42:54 AM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 647 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson