Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No, Loretta Lynch Was Not 'Ambushed' by Bill Clinton
americanthinker.com ^ | 7/4/2016 | Jonathan F. Keiler

Posted on 07/04/2016 6:56:30 AM PDT by rktman

Sifting through the facts slowly emerging from the tattered veil of secrecy surrounding the tarmac meeting between Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton, it is likely that the popular narrative that the Attorney General was ambushed is false. In all likelihood, General Lynch had an important agenda that needed to be communicated immediately to Team Hillary.

Last week I wrote a piece reasonably speculating that Lynch’s meeting with Clinton meant that the FBI would shortly refer charges to Justice, and that Lynch met Clinton to break the bad news and reassure him that nothing would come of it under her watch. Since that article was published new information has come to light, but none that would undermine its central premise. That Hillary Clinton was finally interviewed by FBI agents on Saturday strongly suggests that not only was Lynch’s meeting with Clinton prearranged, but reinforces the idea that their discussion improperly focused on the FBI’s investigation of Hillary.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Arizona; US: New York
KEYWORDS: arizona; criminalacts; criminalconspiracy; crookedhillary; fbi; jamescomey; liars; lorettalynch; phoenix; treasonous
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 last
To: sport

Excellent advice. I remember very how the Democrats behaved during Monica Lewinsky scandal and sexual harassment trial. It was clear that ethics didn’t count and that they’d sell their children into slavery for a political win.


81 posted on 07/04/2016 9:19:22 AM PDT by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: shelterguy

All Hillary has to do is say, “There is nothing to see here.” and most of those who imagine they are fearless journalists simply parrot, “Nothing to see! Nothing to see!”


82 posted on 07/04/2016 9:23:13 AM PDT by Wilhelm Tell (True or False? This is not a tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BatGuano

Being Attorney general makes her the chief law enforcement officer but that is not her title.


83 posted on 07/04/2016 9:36:27 AM PDT by Lion Den Dan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Phlap

Why hasn’t Congress fired Barry’s ass?


84 posted on 07/04/2016 10:00:48 AM PDT by HomerBohn (Liberals and Slinkys: Good for nothing but make you smile as you shove them down the stairs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: umgud

You’re not intimating that the AG serviced BK while her aircraft was being serviced?


85 posted on 07/04/2016 10:01:40 AM PDT by HomerBohn (Liberals and Slinkys: Good for nothing but make you smile as you shove them down the stairs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

Ah......yes.


86 posted on 07/04/2016 10:03:44 AM PDT by umgud (ban muslims, not guns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6
Look up Loretta Lynch’s history.

She has already put Democrat politicians in prison.


Yes, but that was for fraud and embezzlement.

Those were serious crimes as opposed to simply mishandling govt. documents. Something all previous Secretaries of State did. /S

87 posted on 07/04/2016 10:04:00 AM PDT by az_gila
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Have any enterprising journalists done FOIA requests for the tarmac and ramp surveillance videos? Even the your local gas stations have surveillance cameras at the pumps.


88 posted on 07/04/2016 10:11:53 AM PDT by fella ("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fella

Hmmmm. Could it be that the were “inoperative” for a certain length of time? Or maybe the hard drives got “wiped” somehow.


89 posted on 07/04/2016 10:17:42 AM PDT by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Starboard

“That is quite probably what the meeting was all about.”

Get a direct read, eye contact tells as much as words sometimes and all being framed as a friendly chat (but without any friendly pictures of the happy happenstance)

Along with a few well placed wink and nod references from Bill about supreme court vacancies,

And a good time was had by all,

Undoubtedly not the first such meeting, just the first that got leaked,


90 posted on 07/04/2016 12:23:23 PM PDT by captmar-vell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: rktman

It all depends on who called whom and who told the press. There is a possibility that Bill Clinton was told that Loretta Lynch would be at that airport and both Obama and Lynch set him up. This way Lynch has to indict Hillary in order to avoid the appearance that it was fixed. There is smply no easy way out of this for Bill Clinton and Hillary. Either way Hillary loses.


91 posted on 07/04/2016 6:07:35 PM PDT by seawolf101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson