Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin

It would have been easier and less risky to communicate through a phone call than risk meeting at an airport. This means they HAD to meet face to face to communicate something sensitive and important. I think they made a calculation to meet with the possibility no one would even know. they got caught. This reinforces notion that they HAD to meet and risk it.


58 posted on 07/03/2016 12:11:32 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: plain talk

Yes, you are correct. I like how your mind works (just like mine)


64 posted on 07/03/2016 12:23:14 PM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

To: plain talk

I thought of that, but why not just drive to a random spot somewhere away from the airport and in separate cars, then one gets out of their car and talks in the other one? The FBI on scene would have been down with it, they supposedly told the reporter no cameras.

Freegards


91 posted on 07/03/2016 2:34:56 PM PDT by Ransomed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson