Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ted Cruz endorses Marco Rubio’s re-election
Florida Politics ^ | June 22, 2016 | Jenna Buzzacco-Foerster

Posted on 07/03/2016 10:05:35 AM PDT by conservative98

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 221-238 next last
To: lodi90

I think that’s it, you are so angry you want Trump to lose so you go all over this web page screaming and name calling


141 posted on 07/03/2016 10:37:53 PM PDT by Undecided 2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: Undecided 2012

If you don’t find it messed that Ted Cruz would endose someone stabbed the teaparty in the back, lied to his own voters, and tried like hell to legalize 50 million new voters while fragging Trump at every opertunity... then I don’t understand Cruz supporters.


142 posted on 07/03/2016 10:40:34 PM PDT by RedWulf (End Free trade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: RedWulf

What was he suppose to do back a nobody and give the seat to a Democrat?


143 posted on 07/03/2016 10:45:42 PM PDT by Undecided 2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: conservative98

Cruz and Rubio are prob hoping Hillary wins so they can be a ticket in 2020. HA!


144 posted on 07/03/2016 10:51:38 PM PDT by ErikJohnsky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ErikJohnsky

Fact is if Hillary does win we will never have another Republican for at least a generation or 20 or 30 years, if ever.


145 posted on 07/03/2016 10:58:57 PM PDT by Undecided 2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: Undecided 2012

>What was he suppose to do back a nobody and give the seat to a Democrat?

The same could be said about Trump v Hillary, but he spends his time attacking Trump.


146 posted on 07/03/2016 11:54:26 PM PDT by RedWulf (End Free trade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: Undecided 2012

Democrats thought that in 1988 when Dukakis lost, and Republicans appeared to have a permanent lease on the Presidency.

Then came 1992, when Slick Willy trashed that and began the 24 year-and-counting Democrat electoral stranglehold on IL, CA, NM, VT, NJ, NH, MI, DE, CT, ME, PA, MD.

From 1968-1988 (incl.) the first six went GOP 6 out of 6, the next 4 went GOP 5 out of 6, & last 2 went GOP 4/6.

(I don’t buy the Perot-elected-Clinton lie; see http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3441714/posts ).

Point is that no “electoral lock” or “blue wall” is permanent. Bush Sr. lost because of the perception of the economy; if and when recession occurs on Shillary’s watch, whoever the GOP nominates could begin a “Red Wall” or “Electoral Lock 2.0,” because white voters will get even more sick of Democrat racism, and more Hispanics are seeing themselves as “white,” and that doesn’t help the Democrat grievance culture. (see the seething liberals about this trend http://www.cnn.com/2014/05/29/opinion/liu-study-hispanics-favor-whiteness/)


147 posted on 07/04/2016 12:14:23 AM PDT by ErikJohnsky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: RedWulf
The same could be said about Trump v Hillary, but he spends his time attacking Trump.

Exactly what did Cruz say when he "attacked" Trump? Where was he and who reported it?

I ask because the latest that I can find a report of Cruz even mentioning Trump was May 3 -- when the campaign was still underway.

Doesn't seem as if that's "spending his time attacking Trump."

148 posted on 07/04/2016 12:16:54 AM PDT by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: okie01

Attacking Trump:
http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/282408-cruz-trump-wrong-to-attack-judge

BTW, this judge failed to drop a class action law suit after the lead plaintiff dropped out. It’s purely a political prosecution and Ted Cruz knows it.

And you’re still dodging the question, if endorsing a back stabbing, open borders traitor like Rubio is needed to stop a democratic victory, why didn’t Cruz endorse Trump long ago in order to stop Hillary victory?


149 posted on 07/04/2016 12:41:35 AM PDT by RedWulf (End Free trade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: RedWulf
Are you contending that it wasn't a mistake to attack the judge as Trump did -- to label him as "a Mexican" when he is actually a natural-born American.

Seems to me that most everybody agrees it was a mistake and that Cruz was simply being honest. How is that an "attack"?

150 posted on 07/04/2016 12:54:37 AM PDT by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: RedWulf

I’m with you

Why is Saint Theodore endorsing an open borders guajiro like Rubio


151 posted on 07/04/2016 12:54:45 AM PDT by wardaddy (for Muslim wives "no" means anal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: okie01

So its fine for Cruz to effectively give aid and comfort to the Clintons, by piling on Trump? Let Don Lemon and Rachel Maddow do that; Cruz took the pledge, unless he wants to live up to the name Lyin Ted.


152 posted on 07/04/2016 1:01:53 AM PDT by ErikJohnsky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: okie01

Your Cruz talking points couldn’t be more mistaken:

To: Jim Robinson

So, Trump stating that Curiel is Mexican was not a statement regarding ethnicity, it was a statement of legal fact. He’s a citizen of Mexico, by operation of Mexican citizenship law.

5 posted on 06/09/2016 10:37:33 AM PDT by RegulatorCountry

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3438476/posts?q=1&;page=1


153 posted on 07/04/2016 1:04:38 AM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter
Your Cruz talking points couldn’t be more mistaken:

Irrelevant. American citizenship law takes zero notice of other nations' citizenship laws.

The judge may be an asshole -- but he's an American asshole, not a Mexican asshole.

154 posted on 07/04/2016 1:07:55 AM PDT by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: okie01

You didn’t read the link.


155 posted on 07/04/2016 1:12:06 AM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter
You didn’t read the link.

Well, yes, I did. Curiel was born in Indiana. He is, ipso facto, an American citizen.

156 posted on 07/04/2016 1:16:28 AM PDT by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: okie01

Only if you, like Cruz, believe the purpose of the Fourteenth Amendment was enacted to supply the US with a never ending horde of Anchor Babies.


157 posted on 07/04/2016 1:20:24 AM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: ErikJohnsky
So its fine for Cruz to effectively give aid and comfort to the Clintons, by piling on Trump?

How did he "pile on"? He was asked a question; he gave an honest answer.

He then refused to go any further; characterize it as "racist", etc. That would've been piling on...and Cruz avoided doing that.

Thing is, when your guy makes a mistake, you shouldn't try to defend it. Accept it...and move on.

158 posted on 07/04/2016 1:24:30 AM PDT by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter
By law, is Curiel an American citizen or is he not?

Remember, your personal interpretation of the 14th Amendment carries no weight.

159 posted on 07/04/2016 1:36:04 AM PDT by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: okie01
Barring some kind of extinction level event between now and November the next president will either be Trump or Hillary. If you are of voting age and you are not voting for Trump you are supporting Hillary. I could not stand George W Bush. I knew he was a phony conservative and not very bright either. But Al Gore and John Kerry convinced me to vote for W. I did not particularly like Mitt Romney but it was either Romney or Zero so I voted Romney.

Now the open borders, war mongering, crony capitalist McCain I took a pass on. I figured Obama, who at the time we knew very little about, could not possibly worse then McCain so I sat that one out. With President McCain amnesty was a done deal. Amnesty along with chain migration would kill this republic.

We all know what we are getting with Hillary, no one not voting for Trump can plead ignorance. Hillary will give amnesty to 20 million illegals thus giving democrats a super majority for a 100 years. Hillary will appoint radical liberal Judges to the Supreme Court thus rendering our Constitution null and void. Hillary will continue the neocon foreign policy of conducting nation building wars. And Hillary will continue the Clinton family practice of selling out the country for personal gain. Now if all that sounds good to you then by all means keep supporting Hillary by not supporting Trump.

160 posted on 07/04/2016 1:36:16 AM PDT by jpsb (Never believe anything in politics until it has been officially denied. Otto von Bismark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 221-238 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson