Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/03/2016 1:31:23 AM PDT by bryan999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
To: bryan999

From Whitewater to the Lewinsky affair, David Kendall has been there for the Clintons. And now ...


2 posted on 07/03/2016 1:39:18 AM PDT by gunsequalfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bryan999

So what is it that CNN is peddling?


3 posted on 07/03/2016 1:43:14 AM PDT by jazminerose (oective)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bryan999

Hillary’s camp including many in the media sure has spun this many ways, many times. She did it because she only wanted to use one device even though she used 3, she did not send or receive anything ‘marked’ classified, she did not delete any emails, she did nothing wrong, she didn’t do anything others haven’t done before her, there were no backups made, legal experts say charges are unlikely, she did not intentionally break the law, prosecution ‘is not going to happen’, it is just a ‘security review’, she is not being interviewed by FBI she just had ‘a conversation’, and now ‘there will be no indictment’.

All respect to Drudge, he doesn’t know for sure what the sources for the recent reports are. He may be right, who knows. You would think that if it was open and shut that the FBI would be able to figure it out in a few weeks but this has dragged on for months and months. At the very least the way this has dragged on suggests that they have a lot of evidence and need to weed through each piece, get testimony, and decide the merits on each and every one of them. If they have a lot of evidence then logically it means more and more likely that there are crimes to charge. If they only had 1 or 2 pieces of evidence then they could come to a quick decision whether the burden of proof has been met.


6 posted on 07/03/2016 1:56:56 AM PDT by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bryan999
WHY the HELL isn't David Kendall in PRISON?? He had ALL that TOP SECRET INFO and NO Security Clearance!!

I forgot....Laws are for Republicans and little people.

10 posted on 07/03/2016 2:53:52 AM PDT by Ann Archy (ABORTION....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bryan999

When the Democrat party is destroyed through the candidacy of Hillary for President, they will have no one to blame but themselves.


11 posted on 07/03/2016 3:06:32 AM PDT by Cowboy Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bryan999

The thing is, Kendel himself ought to be indicted.

We all keep waiting for this thing to burst open like a raging festering boil.


12 posted on 07/03/2016 3:18:19 AM PDT by Fhios (The U.S needs Hillary like a fish needs a bicycle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bryan999
There will be no indictment.No way,Jose! The best we can hope for is an announcement...soon,rather than on 10/29...to that effect.That way Trump has an issue...a big issue...for the entire campaign.
14 posted on 07/03/2016 3:48:47 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (What Did Loretta and BillyBob Discuss For 30 Minutes In Phoenix? Grandchildren?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bryan999

When Muslims learn more about Islam, they become more dangerous, not less. Radical Muslims are actually the most devout fundamental Muslims. They are the ones who have memorized every line of the Koran.


16 posted on 07/03/2016 3:58:51 AM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bryan999

Wait, check this out! Matt tweeted this at 4:16 eastern yesterday afternoon. He said if she’s in danger (from the LAW) watch for Kendall to start leaks. Voila, Trump and CNN both receive leaks from “sources”...

Just a thought...may mean nothing.


19 posted on 07/03/2016 4:13:11 AM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bryan999; onyx; Jane Long; PA Engineer; Grampa Dave; KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle; SaveFerris; ...
Hillary Rotten Criminal is going to need to beef up her legal defense team,
'better call Saul':

Image and video hosting by TinyPic
28 posted on 07/03/2016 5:43:53 AM PDT by mkjessup (Hillary Rotten Criminal is a f--king murdering sociopath. You want that in the Oval Office?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bryan999

The Clinton tactic is to plant the evidence against them in the media ahead of time-while Starr was investigating, before impeachment and so on.

The planting is done a lot on Friday’s and sometimes it goes over the top and is pulled back like the infamous testimony of Bayani Melvis, the White House steward who ‘cleaned up’ after Monica Lewinsky’s ‘meetings’ with Bill Clinton.

The Clinton lawyers do the leaking and blame it on the other side.

They attacked Ken Starr repeatedly over this but I still remember Tim Russert of NBC saying on the air that the leaks came from the Clinton lawyers.

Russert may have been a Democrat, but he was a lot more honest and had more integrity than other members of the MSM.


33 posted on 07/03/2016 6:23:24 AM PDT by Nextrush (FREEDOM IS EVERYBODY'S BUSINESS, REMEMBER PASTOR NIEMOLLER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bryan999

There are 2 entities here involved in the investigation - FBI and Justice. The FBI is relatively independent under Comey but the Justice Department, a politicized extension of the Obama administration is not, There is nothing the FBI knows that Justice does not.Every piece of evidence that the FBI has is being funneled through Justice to the Clintons.The leaks that are positive for Hillary when they start coming will come from Justice. That is why it was very disingenuous for Lynch to say after she was caught meeting with Bubba that she will accept the recommendations of the FBI AND her Justice staff.Her justice staff works for her and they will recommend what she and Mr Obama wants them to.


46 posted on 07/03/2016 7:20:13 AM PDT by chuckee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bryan999

If anyone here thinks anything will ever happen to Hillary on is get your f**king head out of the sand. The elites don’t suffer consequences. She will be president and the beat will go on. Can’t stop the machine.


48 posted on 07/03/2016 7:23:31 AM PDT by Wyatt's Torch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bryan999

Listen, nobody outside a tiny circle knows the outcome and all we hear in the media is spin or speculation. When Trump speculates on no indictment he’s just playing politics and ensuring he’s in a win-win no matter what happens.

This is a very serious matter for the Clintons. The FBI does not come to your house on a Saturday morning for questioning in order to whitewash or participate in a sham investigation.

Despite all the caterwauling out there about how the Clintons are about to skate once again, I am firmly of the opinion that we have patriots in the FBI who will see that they are finally made to account for their misdeeds.


55 posted on 07/03/2016 7:53:02 AM PDT by SamAdams76 (Delegates So Far: Trump (1,542); Cruz (559); Rubio (165); Kasich (161)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bryan999

One question seems most important in this matter: Does Obama really want Hillary to be President? I think he would be much more comfortable with someone else to carry on his terrible legacy.


56 posted on 07/03/2016 7:59:40 AM PDT by Religion and Politics (Let's get Trump to make the "minority" deal NOW in the USA, much tougher than the Palestinians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bryan999
"I learned the crooked finger wag from BJ"


58 posted on 07/03/2016 8:04:08 AM PDT by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bryan999

This is all BS and baseless rumors:

Those who publicly say they know something don’t know anything.

Those who know something aren’t saying anything.


59 posted on 07/03/2016 8:10:26 AM PDT by Strac6 (Instead of fancy pants America always looses "diplomacy", why not just call the 1/11 ACR first?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bryan999

Drudge on Twitter: So far no legit leaks from either side. If Clinton now feels danger, look for Ken

Ken?! Did Hillary suck him and Barbie into her web too?


76 posted on 07/03/2016 8:36:33 AM PDT by COBOL2Java (Donald Trump, warts and all, is not a public enemy. The Golems in the GOP are stasis and apathy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bryan999

Something doesn’t add up. I am thinking that the word may actually be pretty bad for her regarding the FBI’s intentions. Maybe the Clintons found out that they are indeed in some trouble.

What if the word was that the FBI would at least recommend that Hillary and her gang of thieves lose their security clearances for 10 years. Not an indictment, but a punishment that would prohibit her from holding the office of the Presidency. What if the only option the Clintons had was to try to put Lynch in a box by way of public opinion.That would explain the leak and also what Drudge is saying about Kendall.

Something else caught my mind: Lynch is not known for her quick wit and joking style. When she was asked about the meeting with Bill, she came back with...”I should have asked Holder how to lock the door of the plane”....That was more of a shot back at Clinton than a friendly joke.

What if she really is pissed, which would tell you that he tried a desperate move with the meeting. I think Drudge is on to something here.


78 posted on 07/03/2016 8:37:55 AM PDT by MaxistheBest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bryan999

This caught my eye:

“... If Clinton now feels danger ...”

I ask anyone: is Bill Clinton so stupid that he would have risked creating the mess we are now discussing unless he and Hillary DO FEEL DANGER?

The answer is NO. This was a risky move by Bill to get a message to Lynch and one could easily assume Obama as well. We can speculate on the content of that message but his urgent need to deliver that message is, IMHO, without question.

But talk show wizards this morning seem mystified by Bill’s actions. They would do well to spend a little more time here at Jim Robinson’s website if the are that short of insight into how the Clinton’s think.


89 posted on 07/03/2016 9:08:17 AM PDT by InterceptPoint (Still a Cruz Fan but voting for Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson