Yes, she can dance, but even if she were a finalist on DWTS, she can’t absolve herself of provable criminal action by conveniently forgetting all about it.
E.g. I have a stolen car in my driveway with my fingerprints all over the steering wheel. Someone saw me drive it into the driveway and get out of it. Whether or not I recall stealing it is irrelevant. Facts prove that I did.
“Secretary Clinton, here is an email to you/from you that was deleted from your server which contains classified information. Did you send/receive this email?” Whether she recalls sending/receiving it matters not. Facts prove that she did. The next question might be “You realize that deleting such an email constitutes a criminal act. Who deleted this email?” All she can do in the face of such questioning is incriminate a staff member, incriminate herself, or take the 5th.
An interview of that nature could proceed for a long time with many exhibits being shown with the same line of questioning.
We’re in agreement on all your points. The scenario you pose is exactly what I want, too: an insurmountable mountain of evidence proving criminal actions.
It remains to be seen if Comey and the FBI are, in fact, being allowed free rein in this investigation. I have my doubts. I also have cautious optimism. As for Hillary, she can’t vaporize actual evidence in an honest investigation. The dance routine is to stave off a perjury charge. So that’s what she does, because that’s all she’s got. As you correctly point out, it’s not enough in the face of solid evidence in an honest investigation.