IMHO, she wouldn't take the 5th for political reasons. The optics would be political suicide. So I'm sure that every answer was virtually worthless, padded, front and back, with layers of qualifiers--all, some variation on the same theme, i.e. "I'm a little hazy on the details, so I can't be sure, but I seem to have a sense of the general timeframe being in spring sometime, but, again, I might be wrong, as I don't have a clear, specific memory of that conversation, or even if it occurred at all."
For hundreds of other deliberately deceptive responses that fall a hair's breadth short of perjury, see the transcripts of Cheryl Mills' responses in the Judicial Watch deposition. No doubt, you could print out Hillary's responses onto a clear transparency and overlay it onto Mills' for a fingerprint match.
Problem with the worthless answers from Shrillary is that the FBI knows the answers and can verify them via emails, testimony of others and perhaps even wiretap conversations before even asking the questions.
You can’t get very far prevaricating when the FBI has proof that you know the answer.