Whatever you say, WaPo**
Plus ça change! WaPo Editorial Board now Hillary's Bimbo Eruption Squad.
How do they know? Is the Washington post involved in the investigation? For all they know Hillary and her Saudi sidekick Huma could have been selling off top secret info: Espionage. Currently we have a former FBI agent by the name of Robert Hanssen serving 15 consecutive life sentences in Colorado supermax for doing the same exact thing. If Hillary WAS involved in espionage and they do not hold her to the same laws that Hanssen was subject to, then Hanssen should be released.
Secondly, these cretins completely and intentionally ignore the facts about classified data from very highly classified sources was promulgated about Ms. Clinton's private, unclassified willy nilly like they were Afternoon Tea Invitations. No one gets access to classified data of that nature without first having signed NDAs and affidavits that also stipulate to do otherwise is a FEDERAL CRIME with both monetary and jail times as punishment.
What these self-styled 'journalists' intend is to relegate this whole debacle to the equivalent of a "bl@w job is not an impeachable offense." Just like they did with Bill Clinton.
Given what is publically known I don’t see how the Post could conclude there was no wrongdoing on the part of Clinton. The rose tint in their glasses must be nearly black.
I read the Clinton FBI interview is supposed to be today. If Clinton continues with any of the various versions of her story during that interview she will be lying to a federal agent, among other things. Does Clinton believe because she says something that it becomes true? I have actually known people like that. The amazing thing is others let them get away with the lies because nobody wants the sh*tstorm that results when you call them on it. But, then, the FBI and judges deal with liars every day.
Please, please tell me if Hillary had been a Republican, she would still be afforded this sort of treatment by the Washington Post. At least the National Enquirer from time to time admits to making up their material.
Instead of winding it down, they need to wrap it up - with a straight jacket and behind bars...
Amazon’s newspaper in the tank for the crooked Clintons.
So, after giving a decent account of the facts of the case as we know it, WaPo comes up with this?
WaPo should subject its articles to an "ordinary person" test. Would an ordinary person be prosecuted and serve time in prison for the same actions? Of course they would. Anyone who wants access to government computer systems has to sign acceptable use policies and take annual OPSEC training--I doubt Hillary was exempted from those. And if she was, that's another matter. Willfully disregarding the rules about proper computer use is serious.
Nothing with these people ever “rises to the level”.
Was that term (other than when covering floods) ever in widespread use before the advent of the Clintons onto the public stage?
‘
This latest fumble--er, I mean faux pas--with Bill and Loretta is just frosting on the cake.
Her “intent” is irrelevant. Negligent handling of classified information is enough for a fine and imprisonment, if I read the law correctly.
Quite the scheme, eh? Make a big enough donation to the Clinton Crime Foundation and we’ll leave the information you seek on our open-air server. That sure sounds like espionage, not negligence.
After reading the damning admissions in that editorial, how could the post possibly come to the conclusion that it’s time to move on?
I am SURE the Wapo Editorial Board would write the same exact thing if it was a Republican!!!!! /s/puke
I see the ComPost is sticking with this strawman no matter how many times it gets torn down.
Ms. Clinton committed a grave error in judgment,
But we should trust her with nuclear weapons?
It's just like when you go to the grocery store on Saturday and run into your neighbor. Well, the elite version of meeting at the grocery store, anyway. With private jets instead of cars. And a private hanger where the public is excluded. With FBI agents keeping out the riffraff. But other than that, just like running into your neighbor.
Yes time to clear Hillary of all wrong doing.
However, her conduct does not seem to rise to the level of indictable crime, because she did not set up and use the server with the legally requisite criminal intent or even with “gross negligence,” as it has been defined in relevant case law.
Here is where they have it wrong - DEAD WRONG. No “criminal intent” - or ANY intent - is required to establish violation of the “Federal Records Act”. She “failed to take care” of public documents, period, in a grossly negligent way, which is indicative of why her IT guy is getting immunity and/or pleading the fifth.
Whatever you say, WaPo**
Disgraceful. Wonder how much she paid Jeff Bezos for this piece of crap?