Posted on 07/01/2016 6:55:40 AM PDT by Trumpinator
Reporter Claims the FBI Ordered ‘No Photos, No Pictures’ of Lynch/Clinton Meeting
by Alex Griswold | 8:47 am, July 1st, 2016
In an interview with The O’Reilly Factor, the Phoenix journalist who broke the story of the private meeting between Attorney General Loretta Lynch and former president Bill Clinton said that his sources tell him the FBI was on the scene telling bystanders they weren’t allowed to take photos.
“The former president steps into her plane. They then speak for 30 minutes privately. The FBI there on the tarmac instructing everybody around ‘no photos, no pictures, no cell phones.’ He then gets off the plane, gets on his own plane, he departs, she continues on with her planned visit,” recounted ABC15’s Christopher Sign.
(Excerpt) Read more at mediaite.com ...
Move along people ...
Move along ...
Nothing to see here ....
Ex DOJ director was on one of the shows last night. Sorry, don’t remember his name but when he was asked about why Lynch would do this and what he would have done he said...even if I had thought about taking a meeting like this one of my people would have pulled me aside and told me no, not a good idea.
If the FBI “ordered” the press to drop trou, would they have obeyed?
Related: Judicial Watch is of course an avowedly conservative organization, but their work on the HRC email issue has been above board.— Michael Tracey (@mtracey) July 1, 2016
Is there a partisan element? Yes. But equally, liberal orgs have no interest in transparency/accountability pertaining to the Clintons.— Michael Tracey (@mtracey) July 1, 2016
The Lynch/Clinton meeting may have violated the DOJ's own ethics rules. This isn't simply a matter of "optics." https://t.co/JtNdVIRWNI— Michael Tracey (@mtracey) July 1, 2016
*FBI? Why were they even present you ask? You bet. Someone ASK them.
*Taking orders from FBI not to film, photo or anything? Under what authority, you scum.
*Did FBI see the reporter and verbally tell them, announce to anyone that was even near, like airport workers in the area?
*Secret Service in area for both no doubt? What were they doing during this 30 minute meeting. NOT one of them inside with Bubba and Lynch? Is that not against policy, itself?
*Why is Lynch flying in a private plane in the first place on our dime? I read she was there to meet with the police department - why you ask? To remind them that SHE and this administration ARE in charge. That is NOT Sheriff Joe's group.
*Indeed, every airplane has it's “number” on the tail or wing. GET the numbers - follow the money. GREAT idea. Must be surveillance video.
This whole administration stinks to high heaven and these blatant and aggressive acts are continuing to get worse by the day. Hilldababy is sooooo confident she will not be indicted, it's pathetic.
Did you hear Mitch McConnell's comment yesterday after the release of the Benghazi report, that Hillary is a fine and experienced person and he could work with her as President. MAKE HIM and Paul Ryan RESIGN.
We cannot just sit around talking about this on FR - which is excellent. We must all do something to help Trump, to help Paul Nehlan defeat Ryan in Dist. 1 in WI (not my district, darn it).
Other ideas? HELP keep our great country great.
We need a special prosecutor now. The DOJ and the FBI can not be trusted. The FBI should have arrested Lynch right there and then for this meeting.The Lynch/Clinton meeting may have violated the DOJ's own ethics rules. This isn't simply a matter of "optics." https://t.co/JtNdVIRWNI— Michael Tracey (@mtracey) July 1, 2016
Related: Judicial Watch is of course an avowedly conservative organization, but their work on the HRC email issue has been above board.— Michael Tracey (@mtracey) July 1, 2016
Is there a partisan element? Yes. But equally, liberal orgs have no interest in transparency/accountability pertaining to the Clintons.— Michael Tracey (@mtracey) July 1, 2016
The Lynch/Clinton meeting may have violated the DOJ's own ethics rules. This isn't simply a matter of "optics." https://t.co/JtNdVIRWNI— Michael Tracey (@mtracey) July 1, 2016
“the FBI was on the scene telling bystanders they weren’t allowed to take photos.”
Wonder if they have a US Code provision to back that dictate up. Or only a show of arms and “because we said so”?
That reporter may need protection now
That is illegal as hell. If you can stand somewhere legally, you can damn well take a photo.
Trump for President.
No, they are the best of criminals because they get away with it and do so in front of our eyes.
So FBI agents AND Bill Clinton AND Loretta Lynch just happened to be on the same plane on the same tarmac at the same airport in a random city at the same time?
Wow, what are the odds of that?
This is IN-YOUR-FACE corruption.
I think it is the investigation into the Clinton Foundation that would lead to indictment against both Bill and Hill. I think they were cutting a deal in which Hill will take the fall on the email thing to end her candidacy, but which will not lead to a conviction, to advance an administration approved candidate on the condition that the Clinton Foundation investigation will be dropped.
There are pictures/video somewhere...
That’s because the MSM have been covering for them for decades
“the FBI was on the scene telling bystanders they weren’t allowed to take photos.”
An illegal order is illegal. The FBI should know better especially since their ‘color of law’ division specializes in prosecuting such offenses!!!
Where is the Secret Service detail? What was it doing? Does Lynch get FBI protection as AG when she travels?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.