As I said on another thread, why would the AG/Obama and the Clintons risk a meeting? A face to face meetings means this information could not be securly delivered in any other manner. Not even a courier. The AG either handed over the FBI files or there is something big about to break.
That meeting was to settle the terms.
“...face to face meeting .. could not be securely delivered in any other manner...”
This is exactly how I read the situation. They were covering something big enough that they had to take a massive risk to meet on the tarmac.
Pray the demonrats can’t hold their evil center.
The meeting was to settle terms just as you said - the question is - who is holding the winning card/ has the upper hand, Clinton or Obama (via Loretta who is his courier). Thoughts anyone?
Excellent analysis in your post.