[mandaladon]

Matthews is an idiot!

[Daffynition]

LOL

Chrissie would rather death by a thousand paper cuts.

[PUGACHEV]

.... because they feel explosive?

[SauronOfMordor]

A Muslim who dies in a jihad operation goes directly to heaven. A bomber dies instantly.

A shooter faces the possibility of being wounded or captured, this denying himself Paradise

[Dr.Deth]

Matthews is bombed most of the time.

[mjp]

How much brains does it take to pack yourself up with TNT and go running into a crowd and blowing yourself up? What do you mean, sophistication?”

evil will find the most efficient way to kill, That is what evil does

[Zack Attack]

why do terror attacks “always seem to involve bombing” instead of something else.

Good thinking Chrissie, laser tag could be used instead and it would cut out the massive loss of life.

[I got the rope]

I think he should travel to the mideast and ask them. He needs to understand them so he can come back and share his vast experience with us. I’ll pay for the flight.

[Albion Wilde]

Uh, because Chris Matthews lacks deductive aptitude?

[right way right]

Hey Matthews, why does terrorism almost always involve Moooslimbz?

[MinuteGal]

I also saw that exchange where Matthews was arguing that terrorist bombings "are not sophisticated". The expert he was arguing with finally and abruptly put Chrissie in his place (the dunce corner) with the ins-and-outs of preparations by ISIS, etc. for mass bombing attacks.

And yes, the preparations are planned with sophistication and much forethought.

Motor-Mouth Matthews asks some of the dumbest questions I ever hear from hosts on panel shows....a lot of them he blurts out just to hear the sound of his own beloved voice.

Leni

[bgill]

Because bombs make more of a statement than a bouquet of pansies.

[exDemMom]

MSNBC’s Hardball host Chris Matthews wondered “how much brains does it take” for someone to become a suicide bomber and why do terror attacks “always seem to involve bombing” instead of something else.

It isn't so much that they always use bombs, but that when they shoot up a lot of people, the Democrats blame the guns instead of the terrorists. So, even if 90% of terrorist acts are committed with guns, the liberals only count the 10% that were committed with a bomb.

If they could think of a way to do it, I'm sure that the Democrats would find a way to blame terrorist bombings on anything but the terrorists. Just like they blamed the Benghazi attack not on terrorism, but on an obscure youtube movie. If there is a way to blame an act on anyone other than the perpetrator, the Dems find it.