Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pfflier

don’t know where you got the impression that the F-15E can’t take care of itself air-to-air.


I didn’t say that ....I said the F15E was was not optimized for air air combat its mission...its a ground attack aircraft

your words even speak to that ...You say it can “take care of itself”....correct ...it can defend itself ... that’s its mission get in attack ground targets and get out without being shot down... in air to air ...it’s always a defensive mission for it...it’s not an aggressor in aerial combat

F35 need to be able to defend itself against fighter out to shoot them down.... The F35 not going to be defending itself against other ground attack aircraft that can defend itself ..like an F15e

The difference is between an aircraft assigned to be on the offense against other aircraft in the air versus aircraft on defense in the air...

The F15e is carrying a lot of things that are virtually no use in the offensive air-to-air combat mission... it’s not an air superiority aircraft... it’s a ground attack aircraft that can defend itself and you don’t use it to attack other ground-attack aircraft.. and you sure as hell wouldn’t use an F15e to attack air superiority fighters...


44 posted on 06/28/2016 12:44:53 PM PDT by tophat9000 (King G(OP)eorge III has no idea why the Americans are in rebellion... teach him why)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: tophat9000
Your comments imply that the Mudhen was designed solely as a ground attack fighter and is not a "real" A-A threat. If there is an optimal multi-role fighter, the F-15E fits the bill

In fact, a Clean F-15E is lighter, has more powerful engines and can sustain a higher turning G load than an F-15C. It carries the same A-A armament as an F-15C. The only real difference besides the second seat, is that the F-15E has permanently attached conformal fuel tanks and can carry more external ordnance.

Arguably, that second set of eyeballs is a great asset in A-A combat. I would sure as hell consider using it as an air superiority fighter if the mission demanded that.

47 posted on 06/28/2016 1:35:25 PM PDT by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson