Mr. Redhawk. Your post. Seems so blunt. So . . . on point. But might you not euphemize it? Y’know for PC purposes?
It was mean of me to describe her in such a manner. I would never temper my tone for PC purposes, unless at work, but the word “skank” was not a proper descriptive of her. Perhaps I should have referred to her as a “cosmetically challenged” person of the female gender, but that sounds so weak and gimpy. Then again, I could be nice and just call her a winner.