Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp
The numbers tell a different story. 3/4ths of that pile is the consequence of Southern exports.

No it isn't. It's the consequence of goods being shipped into the United States.

1,297 posted on 10/05/2016 11:35:02 AM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1295 | View Replies ]


To: rockrr
No it isn't. It's the consequence of goods being shipped into the United States.

Which are only shipped into the United States as a result of the exchange value for goods shipped out of the United States.

If the South wasn't producing 200 million dollars worth of export value, (per year) Europe wouldn't have been shipping in 200 million dollars worth of import products. (per year)

This isn't rocket science. Trade must more or less balance over a given period of time or you will have what is called a "Trade Deficit" or "Trade Surplus."

The steady state solution for this equation is 200 million in import value is the result of 200 million in export value.

You are resisting this because you do not like what it proves. It proves that in 1860 the vast majority of the US government Budget, and a huge amount of the Northern Economy was heavily dependent upon slaves.

It proves that when the South became an independent economic system, it caused a severe loss of money to the North Eastern economy.

1,298 posted on 10/05/2016 12:16:08 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1297 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson