People with discernment would recognize his style of writing and mine are quite different. He tends to be the more mature and scholarly type of writer, while I tend to be bombastic and aggressive.
I like incorporating a significant portion of emotion in my arguments because I have long ago realized that humans respond better to emotional arguments than they do to logical ones.
This is one reason why your side always leads with the "SLAVERY IS BAD, AND THEREFORE JUSTIFIES ANYTHING WE DID." Spiel.
People instinctively recognize emotional arguments are more potent, and they gravitate towards them constantly.
I personally prefer to read logical, well thought out reasoning beginning with "First principles", but one must tailor one's method of arguing to the audience for which it is intended.... brother. :)
I know your styles are different. it’s just you two ‘’tag team’’. And your side always leads with the ‘’defending our heritage’’ spiel.