To: Elderberry
This places the burden of proof on the appellant, which is not where it belongs. The government needs to establish a clear and present danger before restricting any citizen’s constitutional rights, and should suffer harsh penalties if it errs. The citizen should not have to establish his right to keep and bear arms; it already exists as a birthright.
This legislation is clearly written by someone who has no understanding of law or the Constitution, or else has a not-so-hidden agenda.
33 posted on
06/23/2016 5:42:03 AM PDT by
IronJack
To: IronJack
This places the burden of proof on the appellant, which is not where it belongs. The government needs to establish a clear and present danger before restricting any citizens constitutional rights, and should suffer harsh penalties if it errs. The citizen should not have to establish his right to keep and bear arms; it already exists as a birthright.Your powdered wig is showing. As Ninotchka observed, "Your type will soon be extinct."
36 posted on
06/23/2016 6:03:50 AM PDT by
Buttons12
( It Can't Happen Here -- Sinclair Lewis.)
To: IronJack; All
Bears repeating.....and a larger font size
This places the burden of proof on the appellant, which is not where it belongs. The government needs to establish a clear and present danger before restricting any citizens constitutional rights, and should suffer harsh penalties if it errs.
45 posted on
06/23/2016 7:04:04 AM PDT by
Red in Blue PA
(war is peace, freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength, obama loves America)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson