To: Kaslin
That’s the second time today, from different sources, that claim the book has been debunked.
I wondered the first time I saw it..”What debunking”?
3 posted on
06/22/2016 5:22:03 PM PDT by
digger48
To: digger48
That's what the evening news was shrieking earlier - "debunked"!, "inaccurate"! "false"!! - but not offering up any counter arguments, just labels.
8 posted on
06/22/2016 5:25:31 PM PDT by
lapsus calami
(What's that stink? Code Pink ! ! And their buddy Murtha, too!)
To: digger48
I wondered the first time I saw it..What debunking? All that means is that someone from Media Matters or MoveOn has said "the book is full of lies" on their blog.
As far as the MSM is concerned, it's debunked.
I would think the Peter Schweitzer might have something to say about the "it's been discredited" charge. I doubt he'll be invited on any MSM shows to respond to the charge.
13 posted on
06/22/2016 5:30:13 PM PDT by
Steely Tom
(Vote GOP: A Slower Handbasket)
To: digger48
What debunking?
The CCF said none of it was true, and the sycophants in the LSM took that as Gospel Truth.
To: digger48
20 posted on
06/22/2016 5:42:36 PM PDT by
Kaslin
(He needed the ignorant to reelect him. He got them and now we have to pay the consequences)
To: digger48
.
Hard to de-bunk something that has no bunk!
.
25 posted on
06/22/2016 6:03:28 PM PDT by
editor-surveyor
(Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
To: digger48
Thats the second time today, from different sources, that claim the book has been debunked.
I wondered the first time I saw it..What debunking?
This is from the official talking points that Hillary's minions sent out to the press. (And yes, it took a foreign HACKER to disclose this information to the AMERICAN public. F**K THE G**D**N PRESS.)
https://guccifer2.files.wordpress.com/2016/06/20150426-memo-clinton-cash-unravels.pdf:
We greatly appreciate all of the support we have gotten from all of you in helping us beat back the false innuendo contained in Clinton Cash.
Over the course of the past week, what was billed as a bombshell book, written in the voice of a neutral journalist and meticulously sourced, has turned out to be nothing more than a tangled web of conspiracy theories without a shred of evidence.
Today, we believe we turned a corner as the author himself, Peter Schweizer, conceded multiple times on national TV that his conspiracy theories lack any evidence and that he omitted key facts from his own reporting. I highly recommend you watch the entire interview from This Week.
So next time you see some "journalist" pulling some apparently nonsense information out of their head... CONSIDER THE SOURCE. I can't wait for Putin to release the rest of the files they have on this treasonous b**ch. (Yes, I'm angry. :) )
37 posted on
06/22/2016 9:32:05 PM PDT by
detsaoT
(This country is toast. Someone please find the next one.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson