So would I. But see, the difference between us is that you threw out 150 names of eye witnesses who saw a light rise from the ocean. Instead, you replaced it with the light of the burning 747 starting from 13,000 feet and going higher. So since my logic doesn't ignore a 13,000 foot rise of a light, and yours does, there's nothing I can say that will satisfy your fantasy.
Dream on. The bottom line is it was not a shot doable by a stinger at that time, and the navy didn’t do it. The witnesses were inaccurate.
I can also provide witnesses for contrail spraying, the Amityville horror, ghosts, flying saucers from space (alone and in formation) a Chicom sub-launched ICBM right off Los Angeles port, and the Miracle of Lourdes.
People “see” a lot of things.
I do not know why TWA 800 went down. I know with absolute certainty that the CIA film showing it climb several thousand feet after it blew up was aerodynamic fantasy.
The front of the plane detached and that would cause an immediate pitch up and stall and with the front section gone it would in effect be a flat plate relative to aerodynamic drag. That aircraft pitched up violently , stalled and dropped like a rock. It did not climb, and the turbines would have went to idle and not continued to give thrust. What the CIA showed was a lie. I do not know why they lied.
The aircraft was probably doing about 250 knots when it exploded. If all the kinetic energy was transferred into a climb it could not have climbed a few thousand feet. That did not happen. This is just plain physics. It did not happen that way.