Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Moonman62

I should noted that 2 seconds was too much. One would have to have removed the nose of the plane in the video , which probably (due to friction) would have limited the ‘time’ it could ‘climb’ (continue on the same path due to momentum) to about 1 second or less.


221 posted on 06/23/2016 11:13:37 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies ]


To: UCANSEE2; Swordmaker
Let's be optimistic and say that it 'gained' altitude for 2 seconds.

At the aircraft's documented rate of climb, how many feet could it climb in 2 seconds?

There is your 'definitive answer' for how much it could have possibly climbed continued on an upward path due to momentum.

222 posted on 06/23/2016 11:21:36 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson