Skip to comments.
In Israel, there's no 'right to bear arms' - and it works
Arutz Sheva ^
| 19/6/16
| Ron Kampeas
Posted on 06/19/2016 2:03:45 AM PDT by Eleutheria5
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
Here's chum. Let's see some dorsal fins, please.
To: Eleutheria5
2
posted on
06/19/2016 2:22:58 AM PDT
by
Mr. Blond
To: Eleutheria5
Channel 7 publishing JTA stuff again? Some of this is as bad as the Daily Backward.
3
posted on
06/19/2016 2:23:19 AM PDT
by
Olog-hai
To: Eleutheria5
Or Ha’aretz, for that matter.
4
posted on
06/19/2016 2:24:50 AM PDT
by
Olog-hai
To: Eleutheria5
If given access to full-auto, I would follow these guidelines, for the full-auto only.
For everything else, I’m following the Constitution.
5
posted on
06/19/2016 2:31:01 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(Chuck Norris finally met his match in Donald Trump.)
To: Eleutheria5
The author is mistaken. There’s a right to bear arms on every square inch of the planet.
Some nations choose to recognize that right, and some don’t.
6
posted on
06/19/2016 2:33:10 AM PDT
by
Windflier
(Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
To: Eleutheria5
Yes, and if we had Israel's demographics, we'd have a lower crime rate, too.
To: Eleutheria5
Check the statistics for Wyoming. And also Wyoming’s gun laws.
Do the same for Plano, Texas.
8
posted on
06/19/2016 2:45:29 AM PDT
by
sourcery
(Without the right to self defense, there can be no rights at all.)
To: Windflier
Israel has always looked at the situation where almost everybody residing there is called upon to defend the sliver of land that is called “Israel”.
There is almost universal training in the care, use, feeding and grooming of firearms, because the enemy may be standing immediately next to you, and nobody knows when the next strike may come. Preparedness is half the battle won right there. The enemy among them may make a first strike, but they had better make it count, because the enemy will have true difficulty in keeping up the fight after the first engagement.
No sensible person whacks a hornets’ nest. But hey, we are dealing with Muslims here. Islam is notoriously short of good sense.
9
posted on
06/19/2016 2:47:09 AM PDT
by
alloysteel
(Of course you will live in interesting times, Nobody has a choice, now.)
To: Eleutheria5
According to the peer-reviewed research in
Armed Resistance to Crime: The Prevalence and Nature of Self-Defense with a Gun, firearms in the US are used defensively about 2.5 million times per year. About a quarter of the time, the incidents occurred away from home.
But in order to compare apples to oranges, let's restate the numbers above as rates per 100,000 gun owners:
The rate in the US at which the private use of guns save lives is 841.8 lives saved annually per 100,000 private gun owners.
The rate in the US at which the private use of guns costs lives is 33.78 lives lost annually per 100,000 private gun owners.
So the cost benefit ratio is roughly a factor of 25: 25 lives are saved annually in the US per life lost due to the private ownership of guns.
Number One With A Bullet ~ Bill Whittle
10
posted on
06/19/2016 2:49:39 AM PDT
by
sourcery
(Without the right to self defense, there can be no rights at all.)
To: Windflier
“The author is mistaken. Theres a right to bear arms on every square inch of the planet.”
“Some nations choose to recognize that right, and some dont.”
You are completely correct.
To: Eleutheria5
I see some of the scenarios they gave there. Individuals can address such concerns by taking the next step from the CHL course, and that would be a tactical course. The CHL course only covers the very basics. The tactical course covers how to respond in specific situations.
12
posted on
06/19/2016 2:52:32 AM PDT
by
Fred Hayek
(The Democratic Party is now the operational arm of the CPUSA)
To: Eleutheria5
How is that possible?
Remove certain minority groups from the equation and I think we would see about a 70% drop in crime........
13
posted on
06/19/2016 2:55:30 AM PDT
by
Hot Tabasco
(My only regret in life is being too young to get to know my grandfathers before they died)
To: fieldmarshaldj
"Yes, and if we had Israel's
demographics, we'd have a lower crime rate, too."
Worth repeating...............
14
posted on
06/19/2016 2:59:06 AM PDT
by
varon
(There's always room for one more on the hanging tree.....)
To: Windflier
15
posted on
06/19/2016 3:52:13 AM PDT
by
wastoute
(Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
To: Eleutheria5
Assault knives need to be banned.
16
posted on
06/19/2016 4:03:02 AM PDT
by
Does so
(Vote for Hillary...Stay Home...==8-O)
To: Windflier
Thank you.
So many people get this wrong.
The article should be along the lines that Israel can infringe on the right to bear arms.
17
posted on
06/19/2016 4:14:03 AM PDT
by
CriticalJ
(Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress.. But then I repeat myself. MT)
To: Hot Tabasco
Remove certain minority groups from the equation and I think we would see about a 70% drop in crime........ More like 90%
18
posted on
06/19/2016 4:28:34 AM PDT
by
Islander7
(There is no septic system so vile, so filthy, the left won't drink from to further their agenda)
To: Eleutheria5
BS article. Most Isreal citizens carry, I have been there and have seen.
19
posted on
06/19/2016 4:29:48 AM PDT
by
exnavy
(John 3:16)
To: Eleutheria5
LOL. In Israel one has the right to NOT bear arms, at least when not on duty.
20
posted on
06/19/2016 4:29:59 AM PDT
by
wastoute
(Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson