I missed how this became a birther thread, even though SCOTUS refused to hear his NBC case on May 17. This is a 2A thread.
Whatchu more worried about?
The two aren't exactly mutually exclusive: if the Constitution is supposed to be supreme law, it should be treated like it, whether it is NBC requirements or prohibiting Ex Post Facto law, or ensuring that civil cases w/ claims over $20 retain the right to jury trial.
Plus you obviously missed the real point: that one doesn't have to resort to calling Cruz untruthful names when there are perfectly good ones, namely: Traitor, Liar, and Perjurer/Oathbreaker.
The 2nd Amendment is a big tripwire; restricting it will likely cause a civil war or, at best, real civil unrest when the next Terror attack hits. Those in power don't realize how close the people are to considering evils no longer sufferable and invoking the Declaration again. After all, one of the obvious purposes of government is to protect from external threat… and our current government is not just showing how inept they are at that, but actually support foreign invaders.
‘I missed how this became a birther thread’
I’d run from that topic too, if I had supported a candidate that ***claimed*** to be a NBC of the US, only to ***learn*** at age 44 that he was actually a NBC of Canada.