An interesting note regarding Obama’s recent attack on gun ownership in the Orlando massacre: Obama claims the instruments of destruction were guns, therefore to reduce the violence, access to guns must be removed.
In the case of Orlando, the terrorist also had explosives and communicated to the police he was booby trapping 4 hostages with explosives to the corners of the building, he would collapse it if they attempted to enter.
Let’s say liberals get their way and remove legal gun ownership from the situation. Obviously, it would NOT have reduced the violence in Orlando, but would have likely increased the violence, as the criminal would have resorted to high explosives first, rather than firearms.
The interesting note, is that Obama must be losing his connections with those also in power. He stumbled into this without thinking through the consequences.
The Muslim terrorist’s use of IEDs is an obvious substitution for firearms.