I have no way of confirming or denying your version and it does sound somewhat plausible and even deniable from Wash DC standpoint. However, it also sounds like a plot to a Tom Clancy novel, if he was still alive. And, if true a lot of people should now be in jail. Thanks.
I wish I could say more about who my source is, and what they were doing for a living back then, but I can't.
I will say that this person informed me of this issue from the direction of a totally unrelated subject. Myself and some of my friends who have moved away, get together two or three times a year to talk about life and drink a little bit.
Several years ago at one such of these events, we were discussing Obama's background and how fishy his birth certificate seems, when this one person said that they were only aware of one actual conspiracy in their entire life.
This person then related where they were and what they were doing on the day flight 800 went down. We all listened incredulously as this person told us what evidence they found, and what they were subsequently ordered to do with it.
This person explained the reasons why they were told to destroy evidence. They said the Commander in Chief had made an executive decision on this matter, and that all Federal agencies and Military units were expected to obey his directive.
This person said there are actually a lot of people in both the military and in civilian positions that know the truth of what happened, but that they have been ordered not to discuss it.
I still know this person. I know what this person does for a living, and what they have been doing for a living since the mid 1990s. This person would be in a position to know what they are talking about, so either they are deliberately lying to me and our other friends (all respectable people of respectable talents and station) for no good reason, or they are speaking of an actual and deliberate cover up.
I do not believe this person has lied to me.
I will see this person again in a couple of months, and I will once again ask them to share what they know with Jack Cashill, but I will not be at all surprised if they once more refuse.
Who needs the sort of thankless sh*tstorm that would come your way if you blow the whistle on a chain of command ending with a certain greasy former President?
I have no way of confirming or denying your version...
...
Of course not. That’s the beauty of being a conspiracy theorist, any hearsay from an unnamed source is sufficient. And any conflicting evidence can be dismissed as being part of the conspiracy.