Don’t give me vapor crap. It was not a spark INSIDE the tank that caused the explosion. I have Jet A in several fuel tanks (have had for MANY years) lots of wires in fuel tanks. I fly with 100% confidence that there will NEVER be an explosion inside any Jet A fueled tank.
Look to the Clintooooon Administration - selling guided missile technology to the Chinese, opening up refugee routes in the Middle East.
Why did Sandy Burger steal documents from the National Archives and destroy them?
I believe Clinton wanted someone on that plane dead.
If there was a problem with center fuel tanks, then why were no planes grounded after this explosion?
I’m not arguing about the cause of the destruction. Millions of flights occurred up to that incident without an explosion. So, I too think that an internal fuel explosion wasn’t likely the cause. I neither buy the conclusion or discount it. I’m asking why would it have been intentionally shot down.
As I've asked before, if you were the President and wanted someone dead can you describe a way of killing them that is more elaborate, complex, uncertain and requires a bigger conspiracy than shooting down a commercial airliner?
For God's sake, you have the full resources of the CIA at your disposal and this is what you come up with?
It doesn’t happen often, but fuel tanks do explode.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philippine_Airlines_Flight_143