Oh, and by the way, James Kallstrom is a lying vindictive bastard.
In a documentary which leans more towards the government stories than the witnesses, he said (paraphrasing) that he would have accepted any evidence that proved it was anything other than a mechanical failure; that he would have welcomed anybody who could have presented such evidence.
James Sanders did. He was imprisoned for his investigative work. Not only that, but his wife was arrested and imprisoned as well, and she did essentially nothing to warrant it.
By your logic, because Kallstrom didn’t accept illogical so-called “evidence,” he is a liar?
“He was imprisoned for his investigative work. Not only that, but his wife was arrested and imprisoned as well, and she did essentially nothing to warrant it.”
Actually, no, this self-appointed “investigator” was imprisoned for theft.
And if someone “essentially” did nothing to warrant a conviction means that yes, they did something warrant it, it’s just that the writer doesn’t like the jury’s conclusion.
“Essentially innocent” is much like one cannot be a “little bit pregnant.”