The name calling isn’t getting us anywhere; in fact, it emboldens them. Let’s try another tack - laughter. Laugh AT them; it shows disrespect.
Let me be the first: Paul HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH Ryan HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH said HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
However, I think that in actual practice a stronger security aspect will require a non-religious test. I agree with Trump’s general thinking on this issue but when and if he becomes president I believe that the policy will actually work out as being much stronger security checks for all prospective visitors and a temporary ban on almost all immigration other than that generated by specific job requirement processes.
To balance this, America should try to rescue and take in as many of the persecuted Christian groups in the ISIS-controlled regions.
One problem with banning Muslims per se is that the more dangerous of them will routinely lie and attempt to pose as non-religious or even of other faiths. So to prevent them from entering the more effective test would be background checks as opposed to religious tests alone.
None of this is going to be easy, but large gains will be made in security long-term if the right policies are adopted.
If Trump is elected, I would really like to see a focused review of the security checks that were in place for various Democrat appointments up to and including the main figures of the administration. The various suspicions about ties to the MB and other security questions should not be swept under the rug, this should be actively investigated.