[garryowenartillery]

My post from another thread,

Sub launched missles.

http://www.navyrecognition.com/index.php/news/naval-exhibitions/euronaval-2012/714-dcns-introduces-a-new-weapon-system-for-submarines-anti-aircraft-self-defense-.html

This was the public announcement in 2012. It was probably in dev/testing for years before this release. This was only one example of many that came up.

This is an easy Google search.

[Talisker]

garryowenartillery: My post from another thread, Sub launched missles.

http://www.navyrecognition.com/index.php/news/naval-exhibitions/euronaval-2012/714-dcns-introduces-a-new-weapon-system-for-submarines-anti-aircraft-self-defense-.html

This was the public announcement in 2012. It was probably in dev/testing for years before this release. This was only one example of many that came up.

This is an easy Google search.

-------------------

Thanks, Gary!

Now let's see if our naval sub combat tech experts have a comment...

Lower Deck: Ridiculous stories of non-existent weapons tests is not the way to explain it.

Any comment on this existing sub missile system, Lower Deck?

OA5599: What hyperbole? I am a submarine vet of that era and I am telling you that we did not have anti-aircraft capability. So either it did not exist or it was a greater secret than the NOFORN, Confidential, and Secret information I was freely given and Top Secret information I was exposed to. Or maybe I'm part of the conspiracy...

Maybe you are indeed, OA5599.

[OA5599]

This was the public announcement in 2012.

TWA 800 was destroyed in 1996. In 1996, I was in the navy in the submarine service. We did not have anti-aircraft capability onboard submarines then, and I'm pretty sure we still do not now.