Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: UCANSEE2
No, I think that a sub launched anti-aircraft missile is just one possibility. For all we know, the sub may have launched the DRONE missile that the other ships were supposed to shoot at.

And what makes you think it's a sub launched anti-aircraft missile and not a surface-to-surface cruise missile? I won't even justify the drone part with an answer.

Or, it could have been a missile fired from a small boat (like the one reported to have fled the scene right after the explosion of TWA800).

That would shoot your whole subsurface to air missile theory right out the window wouldn't it?

274 posted on 06/14/2016 3:31:40 PM PDT by Lower Deck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies ]


To: Lower Deck
You are being to closed-minded you are missing the point I have made in several comments.

I'm not saying that it WAS a sub launched missile. I said that it was possible. I also said it could have been DRONE. It could have been a missile launched from a SHIP, or a decent sized boat (like the 50 foot or larger boats the drug runners use. Like the one that SPED out to sea right after the explosion of TWA800). It could have been a missile launched from the shore somewhere.

281 posted on 06/14/2016 3:44:22 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson