Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin

How ‘bout we finally have a court case to get ‘figure out’ what the term ‘shall not be infringed’ means?

Seems the courts like to cherry pick which piece(s) of the Constitution they wish to discuss in case XYZ; nary a glance or whisper to the unseen/unspoken verbiage around their phrase du jour.

Same w/ the 14th: AND subject to the jurisdiction thereof.

The People should be able to gawk and marvel as the STUPIDITY of the Left to attempt to argue the word ‘not’ is as fluid as the word ‘is’ is...


3 posted on 06/10/2016 7:30:11 PM PDT by i_robot73 ("A man chooses. A slave obeys." - Andrew Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: i_robot73
A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

Those who would be our Masters, the Fascists of the left, would have you believe that the 2nd Amendment gives citizens the right to own firearms.

It's purpose was to restrict any government abuse of our God given Rights which predate the Constitution, the Right to self defense, and the Right to throw off any government that would violate our Constitution and attempt to take away our Freedom!

9th Circuit go pound sand!

5 posted on 06/11/2016 1:48:59 AM PDT by Spitzensparkin1 (Arrest and deport illegal aliens. Americans demand those jobs back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson