Posted on 06/10/2016 7:00:11 AM PDT by SJackson
There was something poetic about the events that bookended the past week of diplomacy. This week began with French President François Hollandes peace conference and ended with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahus state visit to Moscow.
From the perspective of both substance and style, the contrast between the two events couldnt have been more striking.
France hosted yet another anti-Israel diplomatic pile-on. Hollande had hoped to show that France was stepping into the void left by the USs abandonment of its position as world leader. But all the confab served to do was show how irrational and self-destructive France and Western Europe has become.
Neither Israeli nor Palestinian representatives were present at the conference which aimed to dictate Israels final borders. Their absence made the event seem like a throwback to the era of European colonialism. It was as if Hollande wanted to reenact Frances glory days in Syria and Algeria.
In his opening remarks, Hollande recycled the tired claim that the way to defeat jihad is by forcing Israel to give Judea, Samaria and Jerusalem to Islamic terrorists. The document the French Foreign Ministry circulated among participants ahead of the conference recommended setting a timetable for forcing Israel to give the PLO Judea, Samaria and large swaths of Jerusalem, for the benefit of global security.
The French planned their event before the mobs in Ramallah, Hebron, Jerusalem and Gaza publicly celebrated the cold-blooded massacre of Israeli diners at Tel Avivs Sarona Market on Wednesday night. But the latest massacre wasnt necessary to show the absurdity of Frances plan to defeat jihad by empowering jihadists at Israels expense.
After all, Israel surrendered Gaza to the Palestinians 11 years ago. Far from ameliorating the problem of jihad in Europe and throughout the world the scourge of Islamic war has grown geometrically in the past decade.
Frances own recent experience shows that Hollandes peace plan was a delusional.
In 2000, Muslims comprised 10 percent of the population of France.
That year, the state-owned France 2 television network invented the contemporary blood libel of Jews as baby killers with the release and dissemination of its deceptive film which purported to show IDF troops deliberately murdering Muhammad al-Dura.
The Dura libel unleashed the forces of Islamic Jew-hatred in France and throughout Europe. It paved the way for the rise in anti-Jewish violence unseen since the Holocaust. This violence in turn is causing the current exodus of Jews from France and from Western Europe as a whole.
But assaulting Jews didnt satisfy the jihadists.
As last years events made clear, the state authorities desire to deflect Islamic extremism onto Jews in Israel and in France backfired.
Fifteen years after the Dura blood libel, Muslims now comprise at least 15% of Frances population, and 40% of the population of Marseilles.
And today, the same extremists who have terrorized Frances Jews for a decade and a half, have turned their guns on French society as a whole.
Last years Islamic killing spree, from Charlie Hebdo and Super Cacher to Bataclan made clear that as far as the jihadists are concerned, the French Jew-baiters are no different than the Jews.
Even worse, with their hatred legitimized by the Jew-baiters, Frances jihadists feel they have license to direct their rage and guns in whatever direction they choose.
If this werent bad enough for the likes of Hollande, despite the elites attempt to blame Israel for the rise of jihadist forces in France, the native French see what has happened.
Squeezed between political leaders who pretend the problem is Israel and Islamic radicals who deprive them of the freedom to live as they please without fear, public sentiment in Europe is increasingly desperate, and angry. Rather than address their concerns, Hollande and his fellow elites have sought to repress them.
Consider the case of Brigitte Bardot. The mid-20th-century French sexpot and national icon has been convicted six times in recent years for inciting hatred. Her crime? Bardo has written angry books and articles about what she refers to as an Islamic invasion that imperils the French way of life.
Rather than recognize that their own people cant stand their games anymore, and arent buying their attempts to blame Israel for the rise of jihadist forces in France, Hollandes peace conference was proof that he and his colleagues have chosen to double down on their anti-Israel scapegoating.
With a tailwind from anti-Israel activists posing as journalists, Hollande believed that the conference could elevate him, and hide from French voters his failure to defend his country.
The Washington Posts editorial board joined him in this delusion. In an editorial published in the lead-up to his conference, the newspaper argued that the anti-Israel conference should serve as the opening salvo of an escalating diplomatic war against the Jewish state. The culmination of that war, the paper said, should be an anti-Israel resolution at the UN Security Council in the final days of Barack Obamas presidency.
But if this is what the Wests renewed war against Israel looks like, then Israel has little reason for concern.
In the event, even Hollandes accessories the 29 foreign ministers including Secretary of State John Kerry, who attended his meeting couldnt maintain the fiction that scapegoating Israel would secure them. In the conferences closing statement, the most they could muster was a weak condemnation of Jewish construction on the one hand and Palestinian terrorism on the other, coupled with a call for direct negotiations between Israel and the PLO .
If this is the best they could do then it is clear that even if they do pass an anti-Israel Security Council resolution as Obama packs his bags, given the realities on the ground, the resolution will be written on water.
And if Hollandes failed conference wasnt humiliating enough, Netanyahus trip to Moscow reinforced his humiliation, and demonstrated that Europes embrace of anti-Semitism has done nothing for its international stature.
On Tuesday, Netanyahu arrived in Moscow for his fourth meeting with Vladimir Putin in the past six months. Unlike their other meetings, this weeks visit was both ceremonial and substantive.
Moscow and Jerusalem celebrated the 25th anniversary of the restoration of diplomatic ties between Israel and the Soviet Union, which Moscow cut off after the 1967 Six Day War.
Putin lavished the honors befitting a major ally on Netanyahu. In so doing, Putin showed that Israel is anything but isolated, and far from dependent on the goodwill of European basket cases.
Europe and the American Left have seized on Palestinian grievances against Israel as proof that the solution to jihad is anti-Semitism. They have made Israel-bashing the centerpiece of their foreign policy.
In contrast, under Putin, Russia has chosen to base its foreign policy and its bid to replace the US as the chief power broker in the Middle East on reality.
As a result, during his meetings with Netanyahu, the Palestinians were given the attention that they deserve, as a minor nuisance.
After paying lip service to the mordant peace process, Putin and Netanyahu got down to business. They discussed everything from Irans rise in Syria to Israels gas industry to free trade to the approaching rapprochement between Israel and Turkey.
The distinction between the business of real statecraft for a real world as practiced by Netanyahu and Putin, and the imaginary statecraft practiced by the French and their guests, is jarring.
Putin is determined to emerge strengthened from the chaos now engulfing the Middle East, and through it, the world as a whole. As a consequence, he is embracing Israel as an ally and a trading partner.
Westerners, whose strategy for surviving the chaos is to turn a blind eye to the dangers, are targeting Israel with unwarranted and self-destructive diplomatic assaults and escalating economic warfare.
This brings us to the US whose abandonment of its traditional role as the dominant superpower in the Middle East facilitated Russias rise to power.
In the twilight of the Obama era, the US is steeped in an identity crisis. The Democratic Party has been radicalized. The Republican Party is in disarray as the forces of populism and prejudice have been unleashed by Donald Trumps unforeseen rise.
Under the circumstances, and given that the disastrous legacy of Obamas foreign policy, it is hard to see the US restoring its global leadership in the near future.
Given the intensity of Netanyahus discussions with Putin since the Russian leader deployed his military forces to Syria last year, many wonder if a major realignment is in the cards for Israel.
When asked about the prospect of replacing the US with Russia as Israels superpower patron, Netanyahu rejected the notion. He explained simply that the US is irreplaceable.
He is right. And not merely because Russia cannot supply spare parts to Israels F-16s.
Unlike Britain, which was seamlessly replaced by the US as the leader of the free world in the aftermath of World War II, the US has no clear successor. Moreover, despite its self-destructive tendencies, the US remains the worlds biggest economy and most powerful nation. The significance of Americas loss of the will to lead the world is not that the US will disappear. Rather, it will share the stage with other, rising, powers.
For Israel, this means that while maintaining the US as its primary strategic partner, Israel cannot continue to place all of its eggs in Americas basket. As Netanyahu is doing with Putin as well as with China and India, recognizing Americas new limitations, Israel must diminish its dependence on Washington, while developing noncompeting alliances with other powers, based on shared interests.
What Israels attractiveness to other world powers makes clear is that as Americas power wanes, Israel neednt and oughtnt seek to replace it with another superpower patron. Israel today is fully capable of fending for itself.
Putin courts Netanyahu because Israel is strong. And the stronger it is, the more leaders will beat a path to our door.
The failure of Frances peace conference, on the one hand, and the success of Netanyahus fourth visit to Moscow on the other hand, were poetic bookends of the week because they were a vivid exposition of Israels true diplomatic and strategic position today. Israel is neither weak nor isolated.
It is embraced by the rising powers. And the waning ones that scapegoat the Jewish state are leading their countries into economic and cultural decline and security chaos.
If youd like to be on or off, please FR mail me. ..................
They have few friends in the west. Europe is defanged, Canada can't do much other than be supportive, and Canada's southern neighbor doesn't like Israel much. These things can change, but with 8 years of Clinton the US will do little other than project weakness.
Great article. Well-written. Thanks for sharing.
How about a new Yalta Summit with Trump, Putin and Netanyahu?
The 3 most powerful nations on earth. I like it.
This strikes me as a terribly unfair and counterproductive bit of unnecessary doggerel which may - or may not - be a misguided attempt at giving a sop to cuckservatives. If the Republican party is in "disarray," it is because the grassroots has grown tired of the excrement paninis that the GOP-e has been telling us are the only choices on the menu since 1988; and that "prejudice" is not only a created construct, it is a meme which will only undermine the goodwill of those people like myself who consider Israel to be of special importance.
Mr. niteowl77
Obama drove Israel into the arms of Putin.
Selectivity is empowering, ain't it?
Just goes to show when your once friend is now your enemy (or as the kids say “frenemy”), where do you go?!?!?!
Except for gems like this:
After paying lip service to the mordant peace process,"Mordant" is nowhere near the right word in this case. The author might have meant "moribund".
Somebody missed a chance to drop a mordant witticism there.
On the other hand, Bebe also announced the first ever Israeli-Russian war games ... mainly in order to protect and develop the Leviathan and Tamar offshore gas fields ... an also become less dependent on US mil.
First ever Israeli-Russian war game is coming (sometime this summer)
http://www.debka.com/article/25474/First-ever-Israeli-Russian-war-game-is-coming-
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.