.
Much easier to control a population that can’t shoot back.
Right Hillary?
5.56mm
.
Clinton responded:
“I think that for most of our history there was a nuanced reading of the Second Amendment, until the decision by the late Justice [Antonin] Scalia. And there was no argument until then that localities, and states, *and the federal government had a right–as we do with every amendment–*to impose reasonable regulations.”
This ruthless woman either doesn’t understand the Constitution or is purposefully lying. Knowing her as we do, it’s got to be the latter.
The federal government has no “rights,” as most of us recognize, just powers and duties and those powers don’t include infringing upon the rights of the people.
What makes her lie especially galling is that the federal government is failing to do the things it was intended to do: particularly, coordinating the defense of the states; to the contrary, it has facilitated the invasion.
The Bill of Rights were appended to the Constitution by prescient framers—who refused to sign if it was not—anticipating this precise problem: grasping, power-hungry, federal tyrants like Hillary Clinton, her coven of Democrats and an ambivalent “loyal opposition,” more loyal than opposition.
Obama/Clinton will sign an exec ordered banning the use/meaning or whatever of the word Infrigment
“Well-regulated” in the 2A means often-practiced free of government interference.
It has nothing whatsoever to do with government regulations. To the contrary, in fact.
She’s a murderess on her way to finish ruling and ruining our lives, our economy and our now pitiful nation.
She and her Billy Goat believe they deserve another eight years in the White Hut and voters are stupid and gullible enough to give it to them.
Their crimes are monumental.
It’s difficult to know how “ .. Shall not be infringed” could be any clearer. Under the US constitution the government has its just powers delegated, either directly or indirectly, by the people. It has no inherent, or God given, “rights”.
Elections and logic based argument are so Troublesome aren,t they..?
Woohoo....another half a million votes for Trump
under these ruling elite who control DC know that an unarmed populous IS an enslaved populous. It’s not enough for them to possess 60%+ of the entire world’s wealth, they also want those who serve them to eliminate people in mass without resistance. That is exactly what the hag intends to do with the power of the US Presidency.
The federal government has no delegated power given it to regulate the possession, acquisition, or sale of firearms among the several States.
ALL federal firearms regulations, except as they may apply to Territories or protectorates of the federal not under the jurisdiction of any State, are unconstitutional.
It’s a 10th Amendment thing so lawless scum like Hillary can’t see it.
I was surprised to see that Breitbart has a ProMcCain ad which calls his opponent “Chemtrails Kelli” Is Breitbart supporting McCain ??
No it doesn’t. Even the current gun laws are patently unconstitutional.
The government has NO RIGHTS, it only has POWERS delegated to it by the people and the States who created it! Only the PEOPLE have RIGHTS which they have inherently granted by their Creator.
Does The Beast believe that the government has a right to regulate free speech?
Does she believe that the government has the right to regulate the many unwritten “rights” that liberals have miraculously discovered in the constitution?
Governments don’t have any rights. They have powers, except in monarchies and dictatorships. I didn’t even go to law school, and I know that.
Noting that Hillary attended Yale Law School, whatever they’re teaching at Yale, it’s certainly not the federal government’s constitutionally limited powers as the Founding States had intended for those powers to be understood.
For example, one thing that Hillary evidently didn’t learn in law school is that a previous generation of state sovereignty-respecting justices had clarified that powers not delegated to the feds, expressly via the Constitution, so-called federal power to regulate privately owned firearms for example, are prohibited to the feds.
”From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added].” —United States v. Butler, 1936.
In fact, it is disturbing that federal gun laws regulating private firearms don’t seem to have appeared in the books (corrections welcome) until FDR was president, FDR and the Congress at that time infamous for making laws that they couldn’t justify under Congress’s constitutional Article I, Section 8-limited powers.
Franklin Roosevelt: The Father of Gun Control
Also, note that Attorney Stephen P. Holbrook has indicated in his book “Securing Civil Rights” that one of the purposes of the 14th Amendment with respect to the 2nd Amendment was to prohibit the states from preventing freedmen from using firearms to protect themselves.
Finally, note that the courts have been clarifying that police protection is not a constitutional right.
Just Dial 911? The Myth of Police Protection
The Founding States had made the 2nd Amendment so that individual citizens could be their own police.
Remember in November !
When patriots elect Trump, they also need to elect a new, state sovereignty-respecting Congress that will not only work within its Section 8-limited powers to support Trump’s vision to make America great again, but also repeal all federal laws that Congress cannot justify under its Section 8-limited powers.
Note that such a Congress will also probably be willing to fire state sovereignty-ignoring activist justices.