Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Chainmail

The war wasn’t the problem, it was the 4-star clown and the administration running it. At times, the leadership was just rudderless. At other times, they seemed determined to lose. A lot of decisions at the top were a head-shaker.

It reminds me of the war in Iraq. Bush was good in his first term. When he turned progressive, his leadership became rudderless, the war got into a rut, and progress stopped.

It’s all about effective leadership. When we don’t have it, any well-meaning military action with good cause winds up going to crap. Lyndon Johnson and McNamara ran that war like they were smoking crack.


204 posted on 06/05/2016 8:38:13 AM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (Liberalism is a social disease.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies ]


To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

More or less agree with you but it was really a collage of stupid things and some arrogant, short-sighted people.

LBJ and MacNamara: idiots. Thought they were so smart and dealt with us as though we were Kleenex and just as expendable. No clue how the enemy thought and no consistent plan to win. Just a bunch of uneducated guesses.

So while the clowns at the top fumbled, the Soviets, Hanoi, and the Left pulled together a massive pro-enemy/anti-USA political movement that incorporated scores of separate political, protest, and labor union organizations and paralyzed our efforts at home. Most of their foot soldiers were just your average dimwit who didn’t want his own skin punctured or someone related to them and they were suddenly “anti war”. LBJ didn’t do anything to counter any of it.

Our own senior military leaders reacted slowly and unimaginatively to our difficulties with the enemy, the climate, and piss-poor logistics. The only real exception this was General Walt’s Combined Action Platoons (CAP) where young Marines lived with and help defend villages.

The worst failure in leadership was the constant rotation of experienced leaders. By the time a leader developed his own tactics and survival skills, he was moved to some headquarters unit or home if his year was up. The constant cycle of new and inexperienced leaders and troops caused repeating costly mistakes, over and over.

Nonetheless, we had good, solid people at least up to battalion level and we fought very well, day after day, night after night.

Like I said earlier, I will always be proud of us.


208 posted on 06/05/2016 9:21:36 AM PDT by Chainmail (A simple rule of life: if you can be blamed, you're responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson