Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rockpile

I don’t like them either but they meet a market niche.

I’d like to think all those people would rather be able to build a small 1000 sf house on a lot instead ... if it were allowable. People used to raise families in 1000 sf houses so it is not something could be out of reach of single people or young couples just starting out. Today’s “starter’ houses start at about 3,000 sf. which seems absurd to me. It keeps so many people in apartments.

A well designed 1000 sf house would always hold its value and always have a market. People are always “starting”.


70 posted on 06/03/2016 1:08:19 PM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: Lorianne

My house is a bit under 2000 SF. It was built 100 years ago when families having 8 and 10 children was extremely common. Somehow they made it work.


76 posted on 06/03/2016 1:19:05 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

My apologies. I left out condo crud and HOA retards in the above post.


82 posted on 06/03/2016 1:33:54 PM PDT by Rockpile (GOP legislators-----caviar eating surrender monkeys.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

Yup, I just bought a house in a 1950’s subdivision of 1040 sq ft. homes. It’s always been a very family-oriented neighborhood, and even though it’s still relatively pricey, being located in a pretty nice part of the SF Bay Area, there are lots of young families, more moving in all the time. You gotta make good use of that space though!


94 posted on 06/03/2016 2:26:02 PM PDT by Behind the Blue Wall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson