Posted on 06/02/2016 6:31:22 AM PDT by xzins
Agreed
“[...] This is so transparently criminal.”
Thanks for the explanation there. Very clear and concise.
But, any good lawyer should know this, correct? Then where is the judge on this? Why didn’t he/she squash this at the start?
“But what about the millions and millions of middle class working people that are voting for these crooks. How does a thinking person do that?”
You answered your own question there. They aren’t thinking people.
Only exchanges after she became her attorney. Attorney-client does not apply when the attorney is part of a criminal conspiracy. Mills claim is risible on its face.
Well, she couldn't marry her.
ONCE ANY CLASSIFIED INFORMATION HAS BEEN PLACED IN A NON SECURE LOCATION OR IN THE HANDS OF SOMEONE NOT AUTHORIZED TO HAVE IT, THAT INFORMATION IS CONSIDERED TO BE COMPROMISED AND IN THE HANDS OF THE ENEMY. PLAIN AND SIMPLE, ONE DOES NOT HAVE TO PROVE OR SHOW IT HAS BEEN COMPROMISED, THE MERE FACT THE INFORMATION WAS NOT SAFEGUARDED PROPERLY COMPROMISES THE CLASSIFIED INFORMATION.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.