Replies

Men today face a raw deal, and we shouldn’t second-guess their decisions (and freedom to make them).

Exactly. This is nothing but attempted shaming of the next generation to be sucked into the family court slave machine. So what if a guy lives at home? How does that harm our society in itself?

Furthermore. wasn't it an American tradition at one time for extended families to live together? Multiple generations in the same house, or at least in next door houses, working the farm and supporting each other in life? Maybe what the a-holes on the Left are really afraid of: that they won't be able to brainwash the younger generation as easily if they are still heavily influenced by their parents. The Left needs people isolated and needy in order to steal their souls.

For that matter, women should be made to live at home until they are 30 or married. Save us a lot of the headaches that come from the all of the whoring around going on in the country.

That situation (multiple generations living together) is returning due to economic conditions; I think it helps stabilize a neighborhood (so gibsmedats can’t loot while the makers are at work). I also think there is little use for the housing stock in my area (large, old single-family homes) if people won’t fill them, so it works out fine.

American women won’t succeed in the attempted shaming; the guys are too smart, and are looking out for themselves. When states like mine (NJ) are looking at revamping laws to entice men to marry again, then you KNOW it isn’t working.