Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jazusamo

he accepted a deal for immunity from the federal government

HE HAS TO TESTIFY, The Judge should find him in contempt and JAIL HIM, The Lawyers that submitted this motion need to be put in Jail for CONTEMPT Also, and about a $100,000 Fine making sure they are DISBARRED.


2 posted on 06/01/2016 4:25:30 PM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: eyeamok

That’s the way I see it too, will be intersting to see what happens.


6 posted on 06/01/2016 4:28:58 PM PDT by jazusamo (Have YOU Donated to Free Republic? https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: eyeamok

The immunity deal is with the FBI, in a criminal investigation.

This is a separate civil case.


18 posted on 06/01/2016 4:46:52 PM PDT by justlurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: eyeamok

Judicial watch lawsuit is different than fbi investigation.


34 posted on 06/01/2016 5:23:01 PM PDT by lacrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: eyeamok

Are you sure about this? Maybe the Judicial Watch lawsuit doesn’t have anything to do with the immunity deal. Just wondering.


48 posted on 06/01/2016 5:50:44 PM PDT by cornfedcowboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: All
POINTS TO PONDER

<><>State Dept personnel under Hillary may be facing charges of misleading a US court WRT the court's request for documents...and for tampering w/ evidence.

<><> And what of Bill's culpability? The first server Hillary used was the one in their Chappaqua house for Slick/s use when he left the White House......against the advice of Slick/s people.

<><> At some point Hillary went from Chappaqua to a server managed by an outside company. Pagliano probably had some involvement in the migration (if not sole responsibility).

<><> Hillary obviously had to keep her multiple pay-to-play Foundation business off government computers. Fortunately whether it was Pagliano or someone else, the file deletion/wipe was less than professional.

<><> Pagliano’s dual role as: 1) a tax-paid US government employee, and, 2) Hillary's personal employee, opens a whole new arena for investigation.

<><> What was Pagliano’s day-to-day State Dept job? What did he actually do, not just his job description, but actual work accomplishments? Is there a paper trail showing he did any actual work at all, or was the State “job” just a make-work position to get him on the tax-paid payroll in return for his services to Clintons?

<><> Pagliano listed himself on LinkedIn as a political-appointee saying he “Serves as strategic advisor and special projects manager to the Chief Technology Officer (CTO) / Deputy Chief Information Officer (DCIO) overseeing the operations of the Information Resource Management (IRM) bureau.”

<><> Pagliano being employed, by his own admission, at such a high level inside State’s IT structure assures that State’s most senior info officers knew about Clinton’s email setup, and apparently did not, or were not, able to stop it. Unless Brian never told his supervisor about his "other" job.

=============================================

And what abut Sid Blumenthal? He had inside govt info and was constantly in touch w/ Secy Hillry.

<><> For public consumption, Sid was beng touted as a Clinton Foundation hire---the factotum hired to preserve Bill's pesidential legacy (cue laugh machine).

<><> Sid's emails show he had classified info almost verbatim (as confirmed by the NSA).

<><> Blumenthal was urging Hillary to bomb Libya b/c he had profit-making business interests predicated on a new Libyan govt.

<><> Sid also used scare tactics----that Obama would lose reelection if they didn't bomb Libya.

Hillary passed on this information to Obama.....did he know it came from a person he banned from govt employment?

49 posted on 06/01/2016 5:50:56 PM PDT by Liz (SAFE PLACE? A liberal's mind. Nothing's there. Nothing penetrates it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: eyeamok

He accepted immunity from the federal government, in a criminal proceeding. He has to testify there.

This is a suit brought by Judicial Watch regarding the state departments refusal to honor FOIA requests, so he can claim protection from self-incrimination here.

Mark


56 posted on 06/01/2016 8:12:53 PM PDT by MarkL (Do I really look like a guy with a plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson