Ludicrous charges. Even if Arpaio or his deputies flat out admitted they were profiling “hispanics”, “hispanic” is not a race, so that would not be “racial profiling”.
All out blitz on Sheriff Joe and Crew....they want open borders, and we don’t...who’s going to win???? WE ARE, because we support TRUMP!!!
GO.TRUMP.GO!!! ALL THE WAY TO THE OVAL OFFICE!!!
Raise your hand if you believe there is any evidence of this BS.
Kinda like Bill Clinton’s perjury and criminal charges, or Eric Holder’s?
I presume Arpaio’s legal team has explored a motion to remove the Judge for bias, but have not found a receptive higher court?
Ping to (NO LIKELY) referral of Arpaio for criminal perjury...
Begin quote from the article:
Snow, who stood at a lectern for the entire proceeding, agreed. But the jurist noted that a lawyer for the U.S. Department of Justice was at the plaintiffs’ table, as the DOJ was allowed to join the case last year. “[If] the DOJ wants to pursue criminal charges based on my findings,” said Snow, they can.
Wang argued that the plaintiffs have an interest in “seeing that justice is done,” urging Snow to refer Arpaio and Sheridan to the USAO for perjury.
Arpaio’s civil attorney, John Masterson, countered that this would be improper, because the U.S. Attorney’s Office would be unduly influenced and inclined to prosecute if a U.S. district court judge wanted it to do so.
Perjury charges are notoriously difficult to prosecute, and so are rarely brought, several legal sources tell New Times.
end quote
This is a "Snow" scandal! The courts dictates are based on their opinion of what they think should be, not the actual facts.
Snow should take a time out to review and think about what nonsense he is saying. When are common sense and facts going to be used again?
His "Findings of Fact" are pure nonsense. Where do these people come from and what are their educational credentials?
Anything to get Sheriff Joe.